This study evaluates imagined speech decoding from EEG using a strictly subject‑independent framework. Two pipelines—time‑domain statistical features and frequency‑domain spectral bandpower—were compared with a random forest classifier; the spectral approach achieved higher trial‑wise accuracy (49.03 % vs. 37.97 %). Feature selection revealed that only a few frequency bands carried most discriminative information, providing a solid baseline for future cross‑subject BCI research.
arXiv:2501. 09700v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals have emerged as a promising modality for biometric identification.
arXiv:2609.36609v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) analysis requires careful choices in preprocessing, statistical modeling, and machine learning because EEG signals are h...
arXiv:2607. 22980v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have long sought calibration-free operation, but classifiers are typically benchmarked by discrimination alone, blind to whether predicted probabilities are well calibrated - a meaningful gap given nonstationary electroencephalogram (EEG) signals and the risk of overconfident point-estimate classifiers under distribution shift.
arXiv:2607. 03094v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) decoding for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) faces a major challenge: substantial inter-subject variability limits effective cross-subject generalization.
The paper introduces a Cross-Subject Perceived Speech Decoding (CPSD) framework that tackles the challenge of decoding perceived speech from non‑invasive brain recordings across different subjects. CPSD uses a two‑stage training process: first, contrastive learning pre‑trains a source model on multiple subjects to capture shared representations; second, personal specialization fine‑tunes the model for a target subject by extracting consistent components and further training on that subject’s data. A Positional Encoding‑based Spatial Attention (PESA) module is added to remap MEG/EEG data into a standardized reference space, improving cross‑subject consistency. Evaluations on three datasets (Armeni 2022, PKUEEG 2025, Broderick 2018) show that CPSD outperforms baseline methods by more than 6.8%, 15.4%, and 15.8% in Top‑10 accuracy, demonstrating its effectiveness, efficiency, and robustness.
arXiv:2608. 13072v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) decoding models often generalize poorly across datasets and subjects due to domain shifts in acquisition protocols and individual neurophysiology.
arXiv:2609.22092v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) is a low-cost and non-invasive signal source for dementia screening, yet existing EEG-based studies remain difficult to...
arXiv:2509. 17920v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Current deep learning models for electroencephalography (EEG) are often task-specific and depend on large labeled datasets, limiting their adaptability.
arXiv:2608. 12000v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Identifying individual learning styles optimizes pedagogical efficacy.
arXiv:2607. 25626v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Decoding speech information directly from scalp electroencephalography (EEG) into text provides a potential non-invasive neural communication pathway for individuals with severe speech and motor impairments.
arXiv:2508. 17742v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Electroencephalography foundation models (EEG-FMs) have advanced brain signal analysis, but the lack of standardized evaluation benchmarks impedes model comparison and scientific progress.
arXiv:2601. 17883v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) foundation models (FMs) have recently emerged as a promising paradigm for brain-computer interfaces, aiming to learn transferable neural representations from large-scale heterogeneous recordings.