arXiv:2607. 03094v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) decoding for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) faces a major challenge: substantial inter-subject variability limits effective cross-subject generalization.
By Aymen Sarhane, Fouad Lbakali, Mouad Souissi, Jonathan Lys, Giulia Lioi
arXiv:2601. 17883v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) foundation models (FMs) have recently emerged as a promising paradigm for brain-computer interfaces, aiming to learn transferable neural representations from large-scale heterogeneous recordings.
By Dingkun Liu, Yuheng Chen, Zhu Chen, Zhenyao Cui, Yaozhi Wen, Jiayu An, Jingwei Luo, Dongrui Wu
arXiv:2509. 17920v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Current deep learning models for electroencephalography (EEG) are often task-specific and depend on large labeled datasets, limiting their adaptability.
By Jamiyan Sukhbaatar, Satoshi Imamura, Ibuki Inoue, Shoya Murakami, Kazi Mahmudul Hassan, Seungwoo Han, Ingon Chanpornpakdi, Toshihisa Tanaka
arXiv:2605.18251v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Self-initiated attention shifts play a critical role in voluntary behavior but are difficult to study due to the absence of explicit temporal...
By Yuwen Zeng, Dengzhe Hou, Zhang Zhang, Sai Sun, Yongsong Huang, Chia-huei Tseng, Satoshi Shioiri
This study evaluates imagined speech decoding from EEG using a strictly subject‑independent framework. Two pipelines—time‑domain statistical features and frequency‑domain spectral bandpower—were compared with a random forest classifier; the spectral approach achieved higher trial‑wise accuracy (49.03 % vs. 37.97 %). Feature selection revealed that only a few frequency bands carried most discriminative information, providing a solid baseline for future cross‑subject BCI research.
By Frederik M{\o}llskov Trier, Xiaopeng Mao, Sadasivan Puthusserypady
arXiv:2609.22092v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) is a low-cost and non-invasive signal source for dementia screening, yet existing EEG-based studies remain difficult to...
By Haitian Wang, Chamara Madarasingha, Redowan Mahmud, Aneesh Krishna, Ryu Takechi
arXiv:2508. 17742v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Electroencephalography foundation models (EEG-FMs) have advanced brain signal analysis, but the lack of standardized evaluation benchmarks impedes model comparison and scientific progress.
By Wei Xiong, Jiangtong Li, Jie Li, Kun Zhu, Changjun Jiang
arXiv:2606. 16462v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Cross-subject EEG decoding promises more training data, but it also exposes neural networks to strong inter-subject distribution shifts.
By Bruna J. Lopes, Gabriel Schwartz, Sylvain Chevallier, Raphael Y. de Camargo, Bruno Aristimunha
arXiv:2609.36609v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) analysis requires careful choices in preprocessing, statistical modeling, and machine learning because EEG signals are h...
By Parsa Razmara, Woojae Jeong, Aditya Kommineni, Raymundo Cassani, Richard Leahy, Takfarinas Medani
arXiv:2609.36288v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: EEG foundation models (EEG-FMs) are intended to generalize across different datasets by learning representations that, ideally, are invariant to datase...
By Jakob Steglich, Justus Meyer zu Bexten, Shakiba Moradi, Laure Ciernik, Simon M. Hofmann, Mina Jamshidi Idaji
arXiv:2603. 19100v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) enables non-invasive monitoring of brain activity across clinical and neurotechnology applications, yet building foundation models for EEG remains challenging due to differing electrode topologies and computational scalability, as Transformer architectures incur quadratic sequence complexity.
By Dana\'e Broustail, Anna Tegon, Thorir Mar Ingolfsson, Yawei Li, Luca Benini
arXiv:2607. 21402v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-supervised foundation models have recently shown strong potential for electroencephalogram (EEG)-based analysis.
By Tao Zhou, Jing Han, Lingyu Shu, Zixing Zhang