arXiv Machine Learning

Robust Predictive Uncertainty and Double Descent in Contaminated Bayesian Random Features

arXiv:2602. 19126v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We propose a robust Bayesian formulation of random feature (RF) regression that accounts explicitly for prior and likelihood misspecification via Huber-style contamination sets.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 27

Smart predict-then-robustly-optimize

arXiv:2607. 21773v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this paper, we propose and study a robust variant of the smart predict-then-optimize approach that accounts for prediction shifts due to disturbance in the covariate feature space.

By Aakil Caunhye, Xuefei Lu, Belen Martin-Barragan
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 24

Dirichlet Process Mixtures of Trees with Gaussian Process Splits: A Bayesian Nonparametric Framework with Posterior Contraction Rate

arXiv:2609. 27930v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose a Bayesian nonparametric mixture of regression trees with a Dirichlet process prior over tree-parameter pairs, enabling data-driven selection of ensemble size and unifying CART, BART, random forests, and boosting.

By Subhasish Basak, Anik Roy, Sourabh Bhattacharya
arXiv Statistics ML
Sep 3

Robust Bayesian Inference for Unnormalized Models with Mixed-Domain Data

The paper introduces SME-BETEL, a semiparametric Bayesian method that merges score matching estimating equations with Bayesian exponentially tilted empirical likelihood to perform inference on models with intractable normalizing constants. SME-BETEL avoids evaluating these constants and eliminates the need for learning-rate calibration, while providing consistency, asymptotic normality, and a Bernstein‑von Mises theorem that guarantees asymptotically calibrated credible sets even under model misspecification. The authors extend the framework to mixed‑domain data, enabling robust inference for doubly‑intractable models such as spatial preferential sampling, and demonstrate its effectiveness through simulations and an ozone‑monitoring application.

By Jiongran Wang, Debdeep Pati, Anirban Bhattacharya
arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago

A Ground-Truth Framework for Uncertainty Disentanglement with Posterior Risk

The paper introduces a ground‑truth framework for disentangling uncertainty into epistemic and aleatoric components using sample‑conditional pointwise posterior risk. It evaluates current methods, finding that Spectral‑normalized Neural Gaussian Processes and Variational Latent Gaussian Processes best recover the ground‑truth uncertainty, while most methods align more closely with posterior variance and miss predictor bias. The study also explores the entanglement of estimated uncertainties and the impact of modeling choices, providing practical guidance and releasing 13 semi‑synthetic datasets for further validation.

By Frieder Wizgall, Georg Tirpitz, Moritz Seiler, Kerstin Ritter, B\'alint Mucs\'anyi