arXiv AI

A Unified Framework for Locality in Scalable MARL

arXiv:2602. 16966v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Scalable methods for networked multi-agent reinforcement learning let each agent plan using only a small neighborhood of the agent graph.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 22

Scalable Policy Optimization for Networked Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Continuous State-Action Spaces

arXiv:2607. 18554v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We develop the Continuous Distributed Coupled Policy Gradient (CDCPG) algorithm for cooperative reinforcement learning in networked Markov decision processes with continuous state and action spaces.

By Dongming Wang, Pengcheng Dai, Wenwu Yu, Wei Ren
arXiv Machine Learning
5d ago

Decentralized Multi-Player Q-Learning in Episodic Markov Decision Processes with Information Asymmetry

arXiv:2608. 12753v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study decentralized multi-player reinforcement learning in episodic tabular Markov decision processes (MDPs) under three forms of information asymmetry: (A) unobserved actions with common rewards, (B) observed actions with independent rewards, and (C) unobserved actions with independent rewards.

By Larissa Xu, King Bi, William Chang
arXiv AI
Jun 16

Direction-Conditioned Policies via Compositional Subgoal Scoring for Online Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning

arXiv:2606. 16515v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman theory implies that the optimal goal-conditioned action depends on the goal only through the gradient of the goal-reaching distance at the current state, yet standard online GCRL still conditions the actor on the raw goal -- a signal that is geometrically uninformative when the goal is far from the data distribution.

By Swaminathan S K, Damiya Gondha, Theyanesh Eswaramoorthy Rajahkrishnan, Aritra Hazra
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 9

Avoiding unsafe sets when training with Langevin Dynamics

arXiv:2607. 07538v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Training a model with noisy gradient descent can be idealized as overdamped Langevin dynamics on the loss landscape, and a natural safety question is to bound the probability $\nu_t(\mathcal{A}_H) = \mathbb{P}(Q_t \in \mathcal{A}_H)$ that the trajectory lies in a designated failure region $\mathcal{A}_H$.

By Adam M. Oberman