arXiv:2608.29262v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Decision trees are attractive for tabular prediction tasks because each prediction follows an interpretable sequence of feature-threshold tests. Unde...
By Hanul Park, Jeonghoon Choi, Juseong Kim, Sanghun Sel, Giltae Song
arXiv:2503. 12902v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Model trees provide an appealing way to perform interpretable machine learning for both classification and regression problems.
By Sabino Francesco Roselli, Eibe Frank
The paper introduces a moving-horizon approximate branch‑and‑reduce method for training deep classification trees on large datasets with continuous features. It combines a hierarchical root‑subtree optimization framework, branch‑and‑reduce at the root, greedy heuristics for subtrees, and a low‑cost moving‑horizon refinement to improve accuracy. Experiments show the approach surpasses heuristic baselines in test accuracy while scaling better in dataset size and tree depth than existing global optimal solvers.
By Chenxuanyin Zou, Jiayang Ren, Qiangqiang Mao, Jing Liu, Marcus Lai, Yankai Cao
arXiv:2608. 04310v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The Rashomon effect describes the phenomenon that many models can achieve nearly equivalent performance on the same learning task, with significant ramifications for robustness, feature importance, and customizability.
By Zakk Heile, Hayden McTavish, Margo Seltzer, Cynthia Rudin
arXiv:2609.05826v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Dynamic programming for optimal classification trees becomes computationally expensive as the numbers of features and training samples increase. We dev...
By Jiancheng Tu, Wenqi Fan
arXiv:2606. 30995v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent work has shown that well-optimized individual decision trees can match complex black box models in some settings, primarily in noisy domains.
By Zakk Heile, Hayden McTavish, Margo Seltzer, Cynthia Rudin
The paper introduces a look‑ahead splitting rule for Classification and Regression Trees (CART) that evaluates candidate splits by the error reduction achieved after growing a conventional CART subtree beneath each split. To keep the method computationally feasible, a smart look‑ahead algorithm is proposed that learns downstream split values from node‑level features. Experiments on simulated data and two real datasets show that both full and smart look‑ahead methods outperform the standard greedy splitting strategy, especially in hierarchical or interaction‑driven scenarios.
By Andrew Gao, Tianlin Liu, Ruichen Han, Lu Tian
arXiv:2605. 13830v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Decision tree ensembles (DTE) are a popular model for a wide range of AI classification tasks, used in multiple safety critical domains, and hence verifying properties on these models has been an active topic of study over the last decade.
By Ajinkya Naik, Chaitanya Garg, S. Akshay, Ashutosh Gupta, Kuldeep S. Meel
arXiv:2606. 18853v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A recent line of work has reframed individual decision trees as linear models on engineered features associated with their splits, opening routes for oracle inequalities and feature-importance reinterpretation, but leaving open the question of what unified geometric object a forest induces when one indexes its feature map by nodes rather than by splits.
By Nicolas Mahler
arXiv:2307. 15691v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: ODTlearn is an open source Python package that provides methods for learning optimal decision trees for high-stakes predictive and prescriptive tasks based on the state-of-the-art mixed-integer optimization (MIO) framework proposed in Aghaei et al.
By Patrick Vossler, Nathan Justin, Sina Aghaei, Nathanael Jo, Andr\'es G\'omez, Phebe Vayanos
arXiv:2609.23780v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Many real-world decisions require prioritizing high-risk cases, such as clinicians prioritizing high-risk patients before lower-risk ones. Falling rule...
By Varun Babbar, Zachery Boner, Margo Seltzer, Cynthia Rudin
The paper presents a model‑agnostic framework that performs constrained post‑hoc error correction for binary classifiers. It searches for an interpretable conjunction of feature–threshold rules that corrects remaining false positives or false negatives while limiting newly introduced errors, using graph‑based search, depth‑dependent constraints, and a reduced‑histogram threshold evaluation. Experiments on a large binary‑classification problem show that the method can efficiently identify compact correction rules, such as a configuration that removes 90% of false positives while only sacrificing 5% of true positives.
By Qinwu Xu