The paper introduces ANASSA, an agentic AI orchestration framework designed for spatial intelligence in geographic information systems. It addresses gaps in current systems by integrating structured spatial reasoning, multi‑agent workflow orchestration, execution feedback, authoritative validation, provenance, uncertainty handling, and human decision authority. The architecture is detailed with eleven components across four layers, a six‑step Geospatial AI Cognitive Loop, cross‑component contracts, and governance mechanisms to ensure traceability, reproducibility, and accountability.
arXiv:2610.14382v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic AI systems operating over geospatial data require more than autonomous reasoning and tool use; they must also support explicit orchestration, s...
arXiv:2610.34569v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Industrial spatial decisions are assembled across systems that share neither a reference frame nor an owner, and analysts spend substantial effort reco...
Geographic Information System (GIS) professionals rely on multi-step spatial analysis workflows to support decision-making in urban planning, disaster response, and environmental monitoring. The process is tedious, time-consuming, and error-prone.
arXiv:2608. 03018v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern cities rely on an increasing number of digital services to operate, but residents' daily needs are still difficult to meet.
arXiv:2606. 09669v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Spatial reasoning is a foundational capability for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to perceive and operate within the physical world.
The paper reviews ethical and privacy risks of large language model (LLM)–enabled geospatial artificial intelligence (GeoAI), identifying eight recurring issues such as data provenance, spatial privacy, algorithmic bias, and technical risks. It evaluates current responses, noting many remain largely unaddressed or conceptual, and proposes a governance‑aware architecture with enforceable controls illustrated by a flood‑response routing scenario. The authors call for empirical validation, spatially specific interpretability tools, and workforce training to address these emerging risks.
Beyond perception, reasoning is essential in remote sensing for advanced interpretation, inference, and decision-making. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled tool-augmented agents that leverage external tools to perform complex analytical tasks.
arXiv:2607. 12177v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The analysis of satellite and aerial imagery has entered a new era with the advent of foundation models.
arXiv:2610.16679v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Spatial reasoning agents can inspect tool outputs and repair errors, but reusing these lessons requires preserving both the computation and the con...
arXiv:2610.15750v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Google Earth AI is a family of geospatial AI models, together with an agent that orchestrates them. We present this agent, Google Earth AI's Geospatial...
arXiv:2607. 28629v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid transition from reactive large language models (LLMs) to persistent, action-capable systems has exposed critical gaps in the architectural understanding of Agentic AI, particularly in separating inference, orchestration, and execution layers for autonomous AI agents.
arXiv:2606. 13673v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Spatial reasoning, the ability to determine where objects are, how they relate, and how they move in 3D, remains a fundamental challenge for vision-language models (VLMs).