Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) is the standard way to fine-tune large models, yet when its two factors are trained independently, the update ignores the geometry of the low-rank weight change it induces. We introduce LoRA-TSD, an optimizer that treats every LoRA step as a tangent vector of the fixed-rank matrix manifold and takes the spectral-norm steepest-descent step of Muon inside that tangent space, mapping the result back to the factors through a retraction native to the LoRA parametrization.
LoRA-TSD introduces a new optimizer for low‑rank adaptation (LoRA) that treats each update as a tangent vector on the fixed‑rank matrix manifold and applies a Muon‑style spectral‑norm steepest‑descent step within that tangent space. The method avoids costly full‑matrix operations and offers a retraction that is up to 2.8× cheaper than previous manifold approaches. The authors prove that their surrogate recovers LoRA‑Pro, identify the Riemannian gradient as the natural stationarity measure, and provide the first global convergence guarantees for both LoRA‑Pro and LoRA‑TSD, achieving superior performance across multiple benchmarks with Llama and Qwen models.
By Dmitrii Andriianov, Andrey Veprikov, Aleksandr Beznosikov
arXiv:2606. 16454v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) enables efficient adaptation of large pre-trained models to downstream tasks by parameterizing weight updates with low-rank matrices.
By Junghun Oh, Sungyong Baik, Kyoung Mu Lee
arXiv:2608. 19800v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) is a prominent fine-tuning method for large models, achieving competitive performance with reduced memory overhead.
By Haonan He, Xinyue Fan
arXiv:2606. 13767v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) and its variants provide a memory- and compute-efficient alternative to full fine-tuning of pre-trained models.
By Elijah Cadenhead, Cristian McGee, Xin Li, El Houcine Bergou, Aritra Dutta
arXiv:2609.05885v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) has become the standard for parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large language models. Most LoRA variants follow a uniform-LR...
By Huiyi Wang, Daijiao Liu, Lina Yao, Dong Gong
arXiv:2607. 09757v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has become a cornerstone of parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT); however, the conventional practice of uniform rank assignment ignores the functional heterogeneity of neural layers.
By Jiaqi Liu, Haidong Kang, Qihui Zhao, Guo Yu
arXiv:2606. 12921v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) significantly reduces compute and memory costs for finetuning Deep Learning models but is often harder to tune than dense training: when using factor-wise optimizers such as AdamW, it is sensitive to initialization choices, its optimal learning rates transfer poorly across ranks, and it often fails to beat dense baselines.
By Franz Louis Cesista, Katherine Crowson, C\'edric Simal, Stella Biderman
arXiv:2607. 26247v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) fine-tunes large pretrained models at a fraction of the cost of full fine-tuning, but its performance depends strongly on how the adapters are initialized.
By Dianze Liu, Farshid Ghezelbash
arXiv:2607. 16252v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) is a widely used parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) method for large language models.
By Yupeng Chang, Yuan Wu, Yi Chang
arXiv:2607. 17620v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) makes finetuning large language models cheaper by adding to each weight matrix a trainable low-rank update parameterized as the product of two matrices.
By Nikhil Ghosh, Tetiana Parshakova, Robert M. Gower
arXiv:2607. 22251v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) is a widely used parameter-efficient fine-tuning method for large language models, but its performance depends strongly on how a fixed rank budget is distributed across Transformer modules.
By Wei Zhang, Xinwu Liu, Yihang Cheng