arXiv AI

Attributing Preprocessing Invariance in Spectral Foundation Models

arXiv:2608. 14227v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Preprocessing invariance is an appealing goal for spectral foundation models: a frozen model should remain useful when laboratories preprocess spectra differently.

arXiv Computation and Language
2d ago

Do Multimodal Models Decide Consistently on Equivalent Optical Spectra?

The study evaluates whether multimodal models produce consistent decisions when presented with equivalent optical spectra in different representations—tables in nanometers, micrometers, scientific notation, or photon energy, and plots in wavelength or energy. Using datasets of silicon metasurfaces and gold nanoparticles, the authors test several models (d3-nano, Jev 1.13, GPT‑6 Luna variants, Qwen3.5‑2B) and find that representation changes can shift accuracy by up to 41 percentage points, with some models benefiting from photon‑energy inputs while others suffer. Fine‑tuning with LoRA improves performance on trained formats but often relies on a shortcut of abstaining when data are truncated; training with answerable truncations mitigates this shortcut, revealing significant gaps in models’ handling of missing evidence.

By Ziyuan Wang, Genliang Zhu, Xiaobo Chen
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22

Whitening Inverts the Hierarchy: What the Norm of a Whitened Embedding Measures

The paper investigates the use of the squared norm of a whitened foundation‑model embedding as a training‑free likelihood surrogate. It shows that the apparent Gaussianity of whitened coordinates stems from the projection central limit theorem, not from a true joint Gaussian distribution, and that the norm is systematically over‑dispersed compared to a Gaussian reference. The authors explain that whitening reverses the encoder’s spectral hierarchy, concentrating norm contributions in near‑degenerate directions dominated by noise, and propose interpreting the squared norm as a Mahalanobis measure of semantic atypicality rather than a log‑likelihood.

By Mohammed Ahnouch, Lotfi Elaachak
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 26

Physics-Aware Self-Supervised Pretraining on Multi-Domain Raman Spectra

The paper presents a physics‑aware, multi‑domain self‑supervised learning framework for Raman spectroscopy that uses a masked autoencoder with a sparse Voigt‑profile decoder and a denoising objective. It learns transferable spectral representations from diverse biological, chemical, forensic, and materials datasets, and demonstrates improved performance on substance classification, component identification, concentration estimation, and spectral denoising. The study shows that self‑supervised pretraining is especially beneficial for tasks with limited labeled data, that attention‑based probing reveals richer information than linear probing, and that larger encoders benefit more from pretraining.

By Charalampos Davalas, Georgios Levantinos, Anastasios Dimitriou, Nikolaos Papanikolaou, Georgios Th. Papadopoulos, Dimitrios Michail
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 27

Spectral Allocation: Why Muon Outperforms Adam, and How to Improve Muon

The paper investigates why the orthogonal optimiser Muon outperforms Adam in large language model pretraining by analysing the spectral properties of Transformer loss landscapes. It finds that Muon’s momentum buffers exhibit an anisotropic spectral profile with a volatile head and a tolerant bulk, enabling larger effective step sizes. Building on this insight, the authors propose Spectral‑Aware Muon (SAMuon) and a lightweight variant, which adjust the bulk scaling while keeping the head unchanged, achieving 13–24 % fewer training tokens than Muon without extra FLOPs.

By Xiaodong Wu, Wenyi Yu, Chao Zhang, Philip Woodland
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 8

Are Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuning Methods Really Different?

The paper investigates whether different parameter‑efficient fine‑tuning (PEFT) methods truly differ in their approach and impact. By comparing six methods on language and diffusion models, the authors find that many LoRA‑family techniques approximately preserve pretrained geometry, and that restoring slightly drifted singular‑value spectra largely maintains task performance, challenging the need for explicit geometric preservation. They also observe distinct adaptation–retention trade‑offs: LoRA limits forgetting best, DoRA scores higher on average, and PiSSA incurs more retention costs, with performance gains linked to modifications in specific spectral components.

By Yikuan Li, Pinyan Lu, Fanghui Liu