arXiv:2607. 05300v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Parameter-efficient fine-tuning still leaves a broad space of behavior-changing updates reachable, so a poisoned objective can be represented and optimized.
By Fabien Polly
arXiv:2606. 07596v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Fine-tuning often introduces spurious correlations alongside task knowledge, causing systematic failures on underrepresented groups.
By Edward Sun, Dmitrii Troitskii
Parameter-efficient fine-tuning still leaves a broad space of behavior-changing updates reachable, so a poisoned objective can be represented and optimized. We study an alternative: adaptation constrained to the subspace estimated from a trusted pool of existing task adapters.
arXiv:2605.07815v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Muon fixes the \emph{direction} of every matrix-valued update at the polar factor of its momentum, while each layer's step \emph{magnitude} is addr...
By Yuxuan Lou, Yang You
arXiv:2607. 16821v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Task arithmetic, sequential fine-tuning, activation steering, and first-order random search all operate through relatively small perturbations around an already trained checkpoint, and they rely on different local approximations: individual perturbations should be first-order predictable, task updates should compose with controlled interference, useful tangent structure should be stable and possible to estimate, and weight edits should have counterparts in representation space.
By Irina Piontkovskaia, Sergey Nikolenko
arXiv:2607. 22489v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has become a widely adopted technique for efficient neural network fine-tuning, decomposing model updates into low-rank matrices.
By Jianghui Wang, Silong Yong, Francesco Orabona, Marco Canini, Katia P. Sycara, Yaqi Xie
arXiv:2609.00762v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Parameter-efficient fine-tuning is usually framed as a question of how many parameters to update. Under a severe trainable-state budget, however, where...
By Wentao Ye, Zhanming Shen, Zhiqing Xiao, Yao Ding, Haobo Wang, Gang Chen
arXiv:2607. 26247v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) fine-tunes large pretrained models at a fraction of the cost of full fine-tuning, but its performance depends strongly on how the adapters are initialized.
By Dianze Liu, Farshid Ghezelbash
arXiv:2606. 12921v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) significantly reduces compute and memory costs for finetuning Deep Learning models but is often harder to tune than dense training: when using factor-wise optimizers such as AdamW, it is sensitive to initialization choices, its optimal learning rates transfer poorly across ranks, and it often fails to beat dense baselines.
By Franz Louis Cesista, Katherine Crowson, C\'edric Simal, Stella Biderman
arXiv:2609.38811v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Metal additive manufacturing parts are inspected by X-ray computed tomography, where labelled data is scarce, the pores and inclusions that matter span...
By Md Mushfiqur Rahaman, Md Mahedi Hasan, Imtiaz Ahmed, Srinjoy Das
arXiv:2607. 27680v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has become the standard mechanism for fine-tuning large pretrained models, yet its statistical properties remain only partially understood.
By Arunan J
The paper introduces Activation Boundary Matching for Low‑Rank Adaptation (ABM‑LoRA), a task‑informed initialization strategy that uses the signs of layer‑wise pre‑activations from a brief probe adapter as targets for a fresh adapter. By training with a margin‑based hinge objective on these activation boundaries, ABM‑LoRA captures useful adaptation directions that standard LoRA initializers miss, while requiring only a few forward passes. Experiments show that ABM‑LoRA outperforms or matches existing LoRA, SVD, and gradient‑based initializers across multiple models and benchmarks, including T5‑base/GLUE, ConvNeXt‑T, Swin‑T, Qwen2.5‑1.5B, and LLaMA2‑7B.
By Dongha Lee, Jinhee Park, Minjun Kim, Junseok Kwon