arXiv Machine Learning

QMaxCal: Path-Space Regularization for Open Quantum Control via Girsanov's Theorem

arXiv:2606. 19947v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reliable quantum control in the presence of decoherence requires policies that combat the effect of environmental noise on the controlled dynamics.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 21

Quantum Gaussian processes for prediction of channel observations

arXiv:2608. 19306v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Given a set of input states, we consider the task of predicting the expectation value of a Pauli observable at the output of an unknown quantum evolution, using only a limited number of measurements.

By Jonas J\"ager, Yaroslav Khmelnitskiy, Paolo Braccia, Artur Miroszewski, Diego Garc\'ia-Mart\'in, M. Cerezo, Piotr Czarnik
arXiv AI
Sep 17

APGEM: Adaptive Policy-Guided Error Mitigation for Quantum Reinforcement Learning on a Real-World CVRP Case Study

The paper introduces APGEM, an adaptive controller that dynamically selects among four error‑mitigation techniques—Zero‑Noise Extrapolation, Probabilistic Error Cancellation, Clifford Data Regression, and Readout Error Mitigation—based on a utility function and Q‑learning scores. Applied to a realistic Delhi‑based Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem, the adaptive approach improves the quantum reinforcement learning agent’s approximation ratios from 0.84‑0.87 to 0.92‑0.94 under high noise, outperforming constructive heuristics and approaching metaheuristics. The controller’s strategy shifts from a Clifford‑data‑regression‑heavy regime early in training to a balanced use of all techniques as training progresses, demonstrating regime‑dependent selection.

By Shabir Ahmad Sofi, Bisma Majid, Mir Mohammad Yousuf
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 24

Quantum Adaptive Self-Attention for Quantum Transformer Models

arXiv:2504. 05336v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: A recurring weakness in quantum machine learning (QML) is that reported ``quantum advantages'' are seldom tested against a \emph{capacity-matched} classical control, leaving it unclear whether a gain comes from the quantum substrate or from the architectural change that accompanies it.

By Chi-Sheng Chen, En-Jui Kuo
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 17

QEMScore: How Much Does the Measurement Add to Learned Quantum Error Mitigation?

The paper introduces QEMScore, a metric that compares learned quantum error mitigators to capacity‑matched controls that do not use measurement data. Using simulated circuits with exact ideal answers, the study finds that many mitigators gain little from measurement inputs, with a plain polynomial model often outperforming them. On real hardware data, however, measurement inputs can provide predictive benefits, highlighting that performance depends on representation and protocol specifics.

By Yue Zhao, Huayue Gu, Yushun Dong, Xiyang Hu
arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago

Learnt Attacks on Quantum Key Distribution under Channel Noise and Device Drift

The paper studies how an eavesdropper can adaptively attack quantum key distribution (QKD) systems when channel noise and device drift vary over time. By modeling the attack as a constrained Markov decision process and using reinforcement learning to jointly search gate structures and rotation angles, the authors construct compact attack circuits that perform near the theoretical upper bound for both device‑independent E91 and BB84 protocols under realistic noise models. The results show that adaptive attacks can significantly increase the eavesdropper’s information compared to fixed‑circuit strategies, and that the learned attacks recover known optimal cloners and key‑rate bounds.

By Marcel Mordarski, Benjamin Gras, Abdelrahman Shehata, Daniel Budina, Roberto Bondesan