arXiv AI

Noise-regularized training of quantum circuit Born machines under a finite shot budget

The paper investigates how hardware noise influences the generalization ability of quantum circuit Born machines (QCBMs) trained with maximum mean discrepancy. It establishes that the generalization gap is bounded by the complexity of distributions reachable under any noise process, and shows that scrambled local Pauli noise reduces this complexity while biasing the model toward uniformity, thereby acting as a regularizer with an optimal intermediate strength. The authors introduce GENIE, a framework that implements a target noise level with capped error mitigation and dynamically selects the optimal noise during training using held‑out data, achieving provably bounded regret and outperforming fixed‑noise strategies in simulations on synthetic and census datasets.

arXiv Machine Learning
4d ago

Leveraging Quantum Measurement Randomness for Shot-Efficient Diffusion Models

The paper proposes using the inherent shot‑noise from quantum measurements as a resource for diffusion models, replacing part of the stochastic noise normally injected during generation. By modeling measurement error as multinomial sampling noise and mapping the diffusion process onto a bounded hyperplane, the authors derive a state‑dependent adaptive shot budget that matches the mean and covariance of a shot‑noise‑free update. Experiments on an eight‑dimensional Gaussian mixture and MNIST latent diffusion demonstrate that this approach achieves comparable generation quality with dramatically fewer shots—down to 303 shots per sample versus 1.6 × 10⁶ in a high‑shot baseline.

By Tianhao Guo, Dianxin Zheng, Yuhua Qian, Yaohui Zheng, Yuzhi Yang, Merouane Debbah, Chau Yuen
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 24

Cautious optimism for deep parameterized quantum circuits

arXiv:2607. 21409v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A central challenge in quantum machine learning is understanding the scaling behavior of parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs).

By Marie Kempkes, Elies Gil-Fuster, Carlos Bravo-Prieto, Aroosa Ijaz, Alissa Wilms, Jens Eisert, Evert van Nieuwenburg, Vedran Dunjko
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 9

Beyond QAOA: A Review of AI and Quantum Computing for Adaptive Combinatorial Optimization

The review examines how machine learning can adapt quantum combinatorial optimization workflows by learning decisions such as formulation, penalties, shot budgets, and backend selection. It categorizes the literature into three paradigms—AI for quantum optimization, quantum for AI-driven optimization, and AI‑quantum co‑optimization—and analyzes 119 papers, finding stronger evidence for AI assisting quantum methods than for quantum enhancing learned optimizers. The authors highlight limited experimental controls, introduce an M0‑M5 evidence hierarchy, and argue that scaling is a systems problem requiring careful allocation of classical and quantum resources.

By Hoong Chuin LAU
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 3

Quantum MeanFlow: single-shot generative sampling on NISQ hardware

Quantum MeanFlow (QMF) is a new quantum generative sampling method that enables single‑step sample generation by learning an average velocity field over a time interval, unlike the multi‑step quantum flow matching (QFM) which requires sequential integration of an ordinary differential equation. Using parameterized quantum circuits, the authors benchmark QMF and QFM on the MNIST dataset, finding that QMF produces lower image quality than multi‑step QFM but outperforms single‑step QFM at every shot count. Both models were executed on IBM quantum computers, and best‑of‑N rejection sampling mitigates device noise without circuit modification, demonstrating QMF’s practicality for efficient single‑step quantum generative sampling.

By Ashish Joshi, Eshaan Mistry, Takahiko Koyama
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 6

How Much Reconstruction Does Quantum Machine Learning Need? Late Fusion of Independently Trained Quantum Subcircuits

Circuit cutting lets a large quantum neural network (QNN) run as independent subcircuits on small devices, but rebuilding its outputs by reconstruction carries a classical sampling overhead exponential in the number of cuts - the dominant runtime cost in prior work. We ask whether, for machine-learning tasks, this step is necessary, and replace it with late fusion: each subcircuit is trained and measured independently, and a small classical head combines their outputs - a linear-cost, decision-level combination borrowed from multimodal learning.