arXiv Machine Learning By Jonas J\"ager, Yaroslav Khmelnitskiy, Paolo Braccia, Artur Miroszewski, Diego Garc\'ia-Mart\'in, M. Cerezo, Piotr Czarnik

Quantum Gaussian processes for prediction of channel observations

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2608. 19306v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Given a set of input states, we consider the task of predicting the expectation value of a Pauli observable at the output of an unknown quantum evolution, using only a limited number of measurements.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
5d ago

Theory and interpretability of Quantum Extreme Learning Machines: a Pauli transfer matrix approach

The paper develops a theoretical framework for quantum extreme learning machines (QELMs) using the Pauli transfer matrix (PTM) formalism. It shows how encoding, reservoir dynamics, and measurement observables jointly determine the nonlinear information processing capacity of a QELM, and provides interpretable diagnostics that can guide model design. The authors apply their analysis to forecasting nonlinear dynamical systems, demonstrating that a trained QELM’s readout closely reproduces the underlying flow map at leading orders.

By Markus Gross, Hans-Martin Rieser
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 13

Is data-efficient learning feasible with quantum models?

arXiv:2508. 19437v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The importance of analyzing nontrivial datasets when testing quantum machine learning (QML) models is becoming increasingly prominent in literature, yet a cohesive framework for understanding dataset characteristics remains elusive.

By Alona Sakhnenko, Christian B. Mendl, Jeanette M. Lorenz
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 16

Towards Surrogate Based Dequantization of Quantum Reinforcement Learning

The paper investigates whether quantum reinforcement learning algorithms can be matched by efficient classical methods. It focuses on a simplified reinforcement learning setting with a uniform generative model, providing finite‑sample guarantees for classical kernelized Fitted Q‑Iteration that uses kernels aligned with parameterized quantum circuits. The authors identify sufficient conditions on data encoding, kernel choice, and problem structure under which this classical approach dequantizes quantum Q‑learning, and suggest using kernelized Fitted Q‑Iteration as a heuristic when those conditions cannot be verified.

By Pablo Rodriguez-Grasa, Sofiene Jerbi, Mikel Sanz, Ryan Sweke