arXiv Machine Learning

Permutation Robustness Is Not Enough: Action Collapse in Multi-Agent Transformer Policies

The paper examines how transformer policies, which process agents as ordered token sequences, perform in multi‑agent robot learning where agent teams are unordered. It finds that low permutation error can mask action collapse, where all agents choose the same action, and proposes additional diagnostics such as action diversity and same‑action fraction. Experiments show that while a PPO‑ID baseline avoids collapse, it remains order‑sensitive, and that strong equivariance regularization can still cause homogeneous behavior; a weak penalty improves robustness and preserves diversity for three‑agent teams, but four‑agent teams need much smaller regularization weights.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 30

Interpretable GOHR Agents via Sparse Autoencoders

arXiv:2607. 25132v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A central challenge in interpreting learned decision-making systems is to determine whether their internal representations contain concepts that help explain their behavior.

By Shiwei Tan, Yusong Zhao, Weiyi Qin, Wentian Wang, Jacob Feldman, Lazaros K. Gallos, Paul B. Kantor, Vladimir Menkov, Hao Wang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 10

Distributed Dexterous Manipulation with Spatially Conditioned Multi-Agent Transformers

The paper introduces Distributed Dexterous Manipulation (DDM), a challenging control problem involving 64 soft delta robots arranged in an 8x8 grid. It presents a framework using spatially conditioned Multi-Agent Transformers (MATs) with adaptive layer norm, spatial contrastive embeddings, and a behavior cloning method fine‑tuned by Soft Actor Critic. Experiments demonstrate that MATs refine actions through stacked attention blocks, enabling long‑horizon planar manipulation in simulation and real‑world settings, while an action‑selection strategy reduces robot usage by about 65% and lowers wear‑and‑tear, achieving an average error of ~1.5 cm.

By Sarvesh Patil
arXiv AI
6d ago

Cooperative Multi-Agent Vision-Language-Action Models via Reinforced Fine Tuning

arXiv:2609.36588v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study reinforcement learning (RL) methods for cooperative multi-agent Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models. This problem is challenging because VLA...

By Ruixiao Xu, Wong Lik Hang Kenny, Zhiqian Liu, Jianing Guo, Hanxiao Li, Kejian Shi, Shuning Zhang, Pu Feng, Yongjia Ma, Yuqing Ma, Kai Chen, Qi Dou, Yaodong Yang, Xianglong Liu, Simin Li
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 30

RoboBRIDGE: A Modular Framework for Bridging Policies to Robust Real-World Robotic Agents

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have attracted growing interest as a scalable approach to robotic manipulation. While these models are effective action predictors, deploying them as robotic agents exposes critical gaps: no mechanism for failure recovery, inconsistent execution over long horizons, and limited robustness to shifts in observations, tasks, or embodiments.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2

Discrete Diffusion VLA: Bringing Discrete Diffusion to Action Decoding in Vision-Language-Action Policies

arXiv:2508. 20072v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models adapt large vision-language backbones to map images and instructions into robot actions.

By Zhixuan Liang, Yizhuo Li, Tianshuo Yang, Chengyue Wu, Sitong Mao, Liuao Pei, Tian Nian, Shunbo Zhou, Xiaokang Yang, Jiangmiao Pang, Yao Mu, Ping Luo
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 21

Value-Aware Prediction for Robust Multi-Agent Coordination Under Communication Loss

arXiv:2607. 17914v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Robust multi-agent coordination relies heavily on inter-agent communication, which is frequently disrupted by physical and environmental constraints in real-world deployments.

By Kemal Devrim Kafadar, Eren \"Ozaltun, Mahmud Efnan \c{S}anl{\i}, Feyza Orak, Emirhan Gazi, Kubilay Ka\u{g}an K\"om\"urc\"u, Naz{\i}m Kemal \"Ure
arXiv Machine Learning
4d ago

When Instructions Retrieve Trajectories: Diagnosing and Mitigating Generalization Failures in VLA Models

The paper investigates a specific failure mode in vision‑language‑action models, termed instruction‑action binding, where models respond to language and vision separately but fail to combine them to select the correct action under counterfactual changes. Through behavioral analyses of fine‑tuned policies, the authors show that failed rollouts often preserve source behavior or switch to other demonstrated tasks, indicating that language is not ignored but mis‑bound. They propose Equivariant Counterfactual Training (ECT), which supplies counterfactual demonstrations and a paired loss to enforce correct action selection, achieving significant performance gains across simulated and real‑world benchmarks.

By Hung-Jen Chen, Yu-Hsun Hou, Yan-Hong Chen, Yan-Fu Chen, Binghua Cai, Min Sun, Chun-Yi Lee
arXiv AI
Jul 9

HiMoE-VLA: Hierarchical Mixture-of-Experts for Generalist Vision-Language-Action Policies

arXiv:2512. 05693v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Generalist vision--language--action (VLA) policies are typically trained on heterogeneous mixtures of robot demonstrations spanning diverse embodiments, action spaces, and observation configurations.

By Zhiying Du, Bei Liu, Yaobo Liang, Yichao Shen, Haidong Cao, Xiangyu Zheng, Zhiyuan Feng, Zuxuan Wu, Jiaolong Yang, Yu-Gang Jiang