arXiv:2609.13617v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We evaluate whether the improvements advertised for ChatGPT Images 2.5 translate into better performance on forgery tasks with predetermined answers. W...
arXiv:2609.13617v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: OpenAI released ChatGPT Images 2.5 on 8 September 2026, advertising more precise local edits, better consistency across edits, more faithful refere...
arXiv:2607. 25589v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Medical-imaging AI benchmarks combine datasets, DICOM rendering, prompts, provider APIs, automated labels, statistical code, manuscripts, and repository releases.
arXiv:2608. 14942v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper presents the first known empirical investigation of annotator and reviewer performance across multi-source remotely sensed imagery, evaluating human labeling across drone, crewed aviation, and satellite views.
arXiv:2606. 17710v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Medical vision-language models report strong chest radiograph accuracy, and this is increasingly read as evidence that they use the image.
arXiv:2607. 12278v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent vision-language models (VLMs) for computational pathology report striking zero-shot performance on whole-slide image (WSI) visual question answering (VQA) benchmarks.
arXiv:2608.29430v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Industrial recommenders give new content initial views through budgeted exploration, then use early performance to decide further delivery. On many s...
arXiv:2607. 29124v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scientific figures often encode the visual evidence behind scientific findings, yet figure plagiarism remains underexplored as a benchmarked multimodal evaluation problem.
arXiv:2607. 22745v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Rapid advances in image generation are eroding the evidentiary value of visual content in settings where authenticity can affect public safety and personal reputation.
The paper audits a 366‑day autobiographical book generated by a large language model (LLM) against an independent verification corpus. Using a four‑level rubric, 354 of the 366 days (96.7%) failed verification, with only 12 days containing corroborated scenes and 19 days containing actively contradicted claims. Regenerating the same days with current models yielded 100% verification failure, while grounding the generation in the subject’s own corpus improved the rate to 83.3% but still left substantial residual failure.
The paper audits vision‑language models (CLIP) for gender bias using 1,500 artworks from the Metropolitan Museum of Art, focusing on zero‑shot logit differences for prompts like "masterpiece," "quality," and "influence." Unadjusted results show no significant gender effect and statistical equivalence across models, but high residual variance suggests that global zero‑shot metrics are largely noise‑dominated and may miss fine‑grained biases. The study underscores the need for multivariate confound control, equivalence testing, and provenance auditing when evaluating AI fairness in cultural heritage data.
arXiv:2607. 03365v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) increasingly read news and web content as images, where the publisher's identity is visually present.