The paper introduces GROUND, a framework that limits large language model (LLM) analytics to a governed semantic layer for enterprise data warehouses. GROUND supplies approved metrics, dimensions, join paths, filters, and security rules, then validates generated SQL against these constraints before execution, retrying or abstaining on violations. In benchmarks, GROUND eliminates hallucinations across all evaluated categories and prevents row‑level security breaches, outperforming schema‑only, schema‑RAG, and semantic‑only approaches.
arXiv:2605. 21027v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Enterprise analytics aims to make organizational data accessible for decision-making, yet non-technical users still face barriers when using traditional business intelligence tools or Text-to-SQL systems.
arXiv:2608. 06331v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: From natural-language query interfaces to automated report generation, data analysis tools need a description of the data: the real-world entities it contains, which columns function as measures or identifiers, and how tables connect into units of analysis.
arXiv:2608.28594v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Conversational analytics systems assume the user already has a well-formed question, leaving a non-expert facing a blank query box on an unfamiliar ent...
The paper proposes the Analytical Memory Unit (AMU), a memory schema that attaches a full derivation (lineage) graph to every cached result in enterprise AI agents. By gating retrieval with a policy that requires authorization for every column touched, the authors prove that sensitive columns cannot be leaked through derived results, achieving up to 90% lineage completeness to eliminate leakage. Experiments show lineage‑gated retrieval removes 18.8‑25.5% of cross‑department leakage while maintaining 81.5‑82.6% memory reuse with minimal overhead, and a real‑agent proof‑of‑concept demonstrates zero leaks over multiple interactions.
Argo-Bench is an evaluation framework that tests data agents on 210 enterprise-scale data science and analytics tasks, simulating a 2024 New York City food delivery platform with 81 million orders and 7.5 billion rows across 235 tables. Unlike traditional text‑to‑SQL benchmarks, the tasks require agents to navigate a realistic ERP warehouse, reconstruct facts, and perform actions such as banning accounts or allocating budgets, with outcomes scored by a simulator. Each task includes an executable reference solution that proves solvability using only the warehouse data.
The paper introduces DRL, a deterministic relational middleware layer designed to enable transaction-safe natural‑language to SQL (NL2SQL) interfaces over large enterprise OLTP catalogs. DRL interposes between front‑ends and SQL back‑ends, employing dynamic context pruning, relational AST typing, and transactional safeguards (EXPLAIN gating and NULL guards) to keep context within LLM attention limits and detect silent divergence. Experiments on PostgreSQL and MySQL show significant context reductions (up to 92%) and high execution match rates (≈53%) for GPT‑4o, Claude Sonnet 4.5, and Gemini 2.5 Flash, while also revealing that evaluation code quality can materially affect reported performance gaps.
CARGO is a framework for evaluating agentic AI systems in production that addresses the problem of reference-instance divergence (RID), where reference-based judges penalize correct answers that involve different entity identifiers. It treats retrieved references as procedural exemplars, grounds judgments in the live instance’s context, assigns a three-way status to claims, and gates evaluation by retrieval confidence. Using the CARGO-Bench diagnostic suite, CARGO eliminates false penalties and improves discrimination while revealing a limitation in detecting procedural corruptions.
arXiv:2607. 08028v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprise large language model (LLM) applications often begin as prototypes whose behavior is carried by prompts and retrieval context.
arXiv:2606. 18021v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI systems deployed in legal workflows hallucinate at rates that aggregate metrics report at ~52%, but this average conceals where errors concentrate and in which direction they run, leaving compliance officers without an actionable signal for trustworthy deployment.
arXiv:2608. 14590v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents increasingly perform irreversible real-world actions, including database updates, API calls, file operations, and autonomous use of tools.
The paper introduces an explainable, header‑centric framework for semantic table interpretation and data quality assessment that operates solely on column headers. It maps headers to 39 interpretable types using curated lexical resources, applies validation rules to detect data quality issues, and aggregates these into a lightweight quality metric called HeadersIQ. The framework was evaluated on diverse benchmarks, demonstrating broad coverage of noisy real‑world metadata and providing a workflow for metadata‑driven semantic annotation, quality monitoring, and benchmark diagnosis.
The paper introduces ‘DP-SPIN’, a trusted‑curator framework that generates differentially private semantic plans for aggregate insight generation. ‘DP-SPIN’ maps each record to a bounded sparse nonnegative vector over pre‑defined semantic concepts, sums these vectors into a semantic sketch, and releases a noisy plan containing admitted concepts and their masses. The framework provides user‑level privacy by clipping each user’s contribution and ensures that the final summary is differentially private through post‑processing, with guarantees established under both add/drop and replacement adjacency.