arXiv:2605. 21027v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Enterprise analytics aims to make organizational data accessible for decision-making, yet non-technical users still face barriers when using traditional business intelligence tools or Text-to-SQL systems.
arXiv:2606. 08661v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Data agents integrate LLM-driven reasoning with relational data access, executable analytical tools, and multi-step workflow orchestration, making them increasingly central to enterprise analytics.
arXiv:2607. 00828v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate queries, invoke tools, and construct analytical workflows.
arXiv:2606. 19319v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Production data integration is bottlenecked by repeated, lossy handoffs between data owners, engineers, and analysts who must collaboratively discover, structure, and query enterprise data.
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate queries, invoke tools, and construct analytical workflows. Although recent advances have substantially improved workflow generation and execution, the semantic information required to operationalize analytical concepts often lies beyond what is explicitly represented in database schemas and data values.
Production data integration is bottlenecked by repeated, lossy handoffs between data owners, engineers, and analysts who must collaboratively discover, structure, and query enterprise data. We present Data Intelligence Agents (DIA), a system of three agents (Data Interpreter, Schema Creator, and Query Generator) that compresses this workflow by treating autonomous coding agents (ACAs) as a first-class abstraction: rather than emitting text, the agents generate, execute, validate, and repair concrete artifacts, draw on a shared memory for experience reuse, and surface each for review by domain experts.
Agents increasingly generate SQL, orchestrate pipelines, and automate data analysis on behalf of users. While recent work improves query correctness, correctness is not safety.
arXiv:2608. 09532v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Enterprises increasingly seek to query data lakes using natural language via AI-driven tools like semantic operators or deep research agents.
The paper introduces GROUND, a framework that limits large language model (LLM) analytics to a governed semantic layer for enterprise data warehouses. GROUND supplies approved metrics, dimensions, join paths, filters, and security rules, then validates generated SQL against these constraints before execution, retrying or abstaining on violations. In benchmarks, GROUND eliminates hallucinations across all evaluated categories and prevents row‑level security breaches, outperforming schema‑only, schema‑RAG, and semantic‑only approaches.
arXiv:2606. 05679v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agents increasingly generate SQL, orchestrate pipelines, and automate data analysis on behalf of users.
The paper introduces a multi‑agent platform built on CrewAI for conversational business intelligence. Five specialized agents process natural language queries, retrieve and analyze data, generate visualizations via the Model Context Protocol, and deliver actionable insights. The system includes a defense‑in‑depth security architecture, a query parameterization mechanism, and achieves 95.3% functional accuracy with a 24‑second mean latency, outperforming a single‑agent baseline by 22.6 percentage points in accuracy and 20.2% in quality.
arXiv:2508. 05002v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Existing unstructured data analytics systems rely on experts to write code and manage complex analysis workflows, making them both expensive and time-consuming.
DI-Bench is a pipeline that automatically creates realistic data intelligence benchmarks for enterprise agents by linking data tables, dimensions, metrics, and documents into an artifact graph. It generates questions that combine structured data queries with knowledge retrieval, validates answers via query execution and LLM-generated questions, and has produced a 731-task benchmark covering knowledge retrieval, analytical computation, and rule‑grounded reasoning. Evaluation of four models on this benchmark shows that only 32% accuracy is achieved on computational tasks that involve business rules modifying the computation.