arXiv AI
Jul 14

QwenPaw-Data: Bridging Facts, Methodology, and Execution for Autonomous Enterprise Data Analytics

arXiv:2607. 11019v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprise data analysis is emerging as a distinct frontier for autonomous agents.

By Tianjing Zeng, Yuntao Hong, Zhongjun Ding, Dandan Liu, Yinan Mei, Yunxiang Su, Yiming Wang, Xiaojian Zhang, Jingyu Zhu, Junhao Zhu, Zhuowen Liang, Jiazhen Peng, Lianggui Weng, Zhihao Ding, Kerui Yi, Qifeng Wang, Rong Zhu, Bolin Ding, Liyu Mou, Jingren Zhou
arXiv AI
Aug 7

Tytan: Interactive Neurosymbolic Construction of Analytic Semantic Schemas from Relational Data

arXiv:2608. 06331v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: From natural-language query interfaces to automated report generation, data analysis tools need a description of the data: the real-world entities it contains, which columns function as measures or identifiers, and how tables connect into units of analysis.

By Donna Hooshmand, Shubham Shahi, Cameron Barrie, Abhratanu Dutta, Marko Sterbentz, Harper Pack, Kristian J. Hammond
arXiv AI
Aug 28

GROUND: Reducing Hallucinations in LLM-Based Enterprise Analytics Through Governed Semantic Definitions

The paper introduces GROUND, a framework that limits large language model (LLM) analytics to a governed semantic layer for enterprise data warehouses. GROUND supplies approved metrics, dimensions, join paths, filters, and security rules, then validates generated SQL against these constraints before execution, retrying or abstaining on violations. In benchmarks, GROUND eliminates hallucinations across all evaluated categories and prevents row‑level security breaches, outperforming schema‑only, schema‑RAG, and semantic‑only approaches.

By Aravind Sasidharan Pillai
arXiv AI
4d ago

AvalancheBench: Evaluating Enterprise Agent-Driven Semantic Query Processing Through Latent World Recovery

AvalancheBench is a multimodal enterprise analytics benchmark that tests data agents’ ability to recover a latent world from observed data, using 58 questions across text, images, and documents. It evaluates agents on analytical fidelity, monetary cost, and a new capability‑adjusted token cost (CATC) metric, revealing that misinterpreting requirements and misuse of semantic operators are the biggest sources of error. The benchmark highlights how errors can propagate through dependent questions, affecting overall performance.

By Darek Kleczek, Fuheng Zhao, Alexander W. Lee, Julien Tissier, Pawel Liskowski, Ugur Cetintemel, Anupam Datta