arXiv:2609. 11326v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We ask whether it can be certified algorithmically that a self-modifying computational system preserves a safety property at its next step (preservation) and along its whole evolution (persistence).
By Jose Pascual Gumbau Mezquita
arXiv:2606. 07303v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Representation learning is central to modern machine learning, yet most research focuses on optimizing representations after a framework has been selected.
By Jacques Raynal, Pierre Slangen, Elsa Raynal, Jacques Margerit
arXiv:2608. 15147v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine intelligence has conquered the symbolic world but stalled at the physical one.
By Jiang Jiang (Persagy Science and Technology Co., Beijing, China), Yifu Sun (Persagy Science and Technology Co., Beijing, China), Qi Shen (Persagy Science and Technology Co., Beijing, China)
The paper proves that algorithmic safety verification for Turing‑complete, self‑modifying systems—whether fixed or recursively self‑improving—is fundamentally limited. Statistically, no verifier can be sound, complete, and tractable across unbounded domains, all finite configurations, or succinctly described finite environments, due to Rice’s, Gödel’s, Trakhtenbrot’s, coNP, and PSPACE barriers. Dynamically, even a single self‑modification step can render safety properties undecidable, and no total supervisory algorithm can guarantee correctness for all such transformations, though a monitor that raises alarms on violations remains feasible.
whyItMatters":"The results show that formal safety guarantees for recursive self‑improvement are unattainable, highlighting intrinsic verification barriers for advanced AI systems."
By Jose Pascual Gumbau Mezquita
arXiv:2608. 01548v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Language can be viewed as a formalized subset of thought: a consequence-governed symbolic structure projected from wider situated cognition.
By Yi Liu
arXiv:2607. 04505v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We advance the hypothesis that human mathematical reasoning, constrained by both the undecidability and the computational intractability of even modest logical fragments, relies fundamentally on pattern matching from domains external to pure deduction.
By Charanjit S. Jutla, Vimal Sharma
arXiv:2606. 14688v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI systems coupled to proof assistants now generate formal mathematics at scale, and the gap between what a checker can verify and what a mathematician would value has become the binding constraint.
By Xiaoyu Li, Andi Han, Dai Shi, Zheng Gao, Jiaojiao Jiang, Junbin Gao
arXiv:2606. 12502v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose that value -- the quantity goal-directed agents create, destroy, and exchange -- is a lawful structural quantity in the same category as information.
By Cheng Qian
arXiv:2608.22347v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: A cognitive architecture is more than the module that reasons: it must also decide how long to think and what deserves the effort. We built a minimal b...
By Francisco M. Arrabal-Campos, Francisco G. Montoya, Alfredo Alcayde, Ignacio Fern\'andez
arXiv:2606. 28639v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We establish the mathematical limits of AGI safety in two forms: verifying a fixed system, and verifying that a certified safety property persists once the system self-modifies.
By Jose Pascual Gumbau Mezquita
arXiv:2608. 10420v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reasoning shortcuts are solutions of a neurosymbolic system's rules that produce correct predictions through unintended concepts.
By Xin Xu
arXiv:2606. 15712v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We ask a structural question: given unreliable elementary problem-solvers, what organizations of them solve hard problems reliably, and what are the limits?
By Hidayet Aksu