The paper argues that as large language models (LLMs) expand, privacy concerns grow, yet current approaches tend to seek a single, universal privacy solution. It emphasizes that privacy is inherently contextual, and warns that a unified framework can give a misleading sense of security and ignore fundamental tensions among desired privacy properties. The authors propose focusing on application‑specific deployment, context‑specific evaluation, and improved privacy literacy as key future directions.
arXiv:2609.35937v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While prior work has documented privacy failures in LLM agents, it remains unclear how the presentation of privacy guidance influences their choice o...
The study investigates how users perceive the helpfulness and privacy-preservation of large language model (LLM) responses in privacy-sensitive scenarios. Using 94 participants and 90 PrivacyLens scenarios, researchers found that users’ evaluations of identical LLM outputs varied widely, whereas five proxy LLM judges showed high agreement but low correlation with user judgments. The results suggest that proxy LLMs cannot reliably estimate users’ diverse perceptions of utility and privacy, highlighting the need for more user-centered evaluation methods.
arXiv:2601. 14660v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Agentic Large Language Models (LLMs) are models able to reason, plan, and execute tools over unstructured data.
arXiv:2607. 10709v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) services introduce a fundamental privacy challenge.
arXiv:2607. 22695v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are capable of generalizing human language for the completion of never-before-seen tasks, leading to widespread deployment.
arXiv:2606. 05004v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: With the widespread deployment of public large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, protecting user prompt privacy has become an increasingly critical issue.
The paper introduces Veil-then-Reveal (VtR), a user-side framework that pseudo‑anonymizes personally identifiable information (PII) in prompts sent to large language models (LLMs) under a zero‑trust model. VtR replaces detected PII with realistic, same‑type surrogates using format‑preserving encryption for structured data and a keyed‑hash dictionary for semantic data, while preserving linguistic and structural cues. The system achieves high detection recall (97.9%), strong protection of detected values (95.2%), and near‑perfect round‑trip restoration (99.9%) across three datasets.
Privacy risks in text-only Large Language Models (LLMs) are well studied, particularly their tendency to memorize and leak sensitive information. However, Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs), which process both text and images, introduce unique privacy challenges that remain underexplored.
arXiv:2606. 09401v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent work has applied differential privacy (DP) to adapt large language models (LLMs) for sensitive applications, offering theoretical guarantees.
The paper investigates how privacy-preserving sanitization of user context in large language model (LLM) interactions affects downstream performance. It identifies three mechanisms—Context‑Dependent Utility, Strategic Adaptation, and Combinatorial Interplay—that explain when and how to sanitize data. Based on these insights, the authors propose an intent‑driven local protection framework using a lightweight model (Veilmind‑4B) to dynamically extract, sanitize, and restore context, achieving lower privacy leakage while maintaining higher utility than existing baselines.
The paper argues that privacy in personalized AI should be viewed as a system-level issue rather than just a model-level one. It identifies four interconnected privacy‑risk channels in personalized AI and proposes four system‑level requirements—interaction trajectories, internal information flows, indirect leakage, and the privacy‑utility trade‑off—for evaluating privacy. The authors call for these requirements to be systematically incorporated into privacy audits of personalized AI systems.
arXiv:2606. 09125v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Privacy risks in text-only Large Language Models (LLMs) are well studied, particularly their tendency to memorize and leak sensitive information.