arXiv:2607. 10709v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) services introduce a fundamental privacy challenge.
By Chen Gu, Hui Wan, Donghui Hu, Hui Wang, Zhuoer Gu
arXiv:2606. 09401v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent work has applied differential privacy (DP) to adapt large language models (LLMs) for sensitive applications, offering theoretical guarantees.
By Bart{\l}omiej Marek, Lorenzo Rossi, Vincent Hanke, Xun Wang, Michael Backes, Franziska Boenisch, Adam Dziedzic
Autonomous LLM agents executing multi-step workflows over personal data often misalign with user privacy expectations and leak sensitive, out-of-context information. Although Contextual Integrity (CI)...
arXiv:2606. 24623v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation enhances large language models by incorporating external knowledge, but deploying it in sensitive scenarios risks privacy leakage via malicious prompts.
By Yuanhe Zhao, Tianyu Zhang, Huafei Xing, Derek F. Wong, Jianbin Li, Tao Fang
PrivacyFlow introduces a new benchmark, PrivacyBench, and a defense system that separates privacy planning from task execution in autonomous LLM agents. The system traces data provenance, models recipient knowledge, and simulates inference attacks to weigh disclosure risk against task utility, allowing it to minimize or block data sharing. Experiments show that PrivacyFlow reduces privacy failures and increases completed task sequences by 22–55 percentage points, while revealing a tradeoff between privacy, utility, and user autonomy.
By Robin Staab, Tom Wollschl\"ager, Vahab Mirrokni, Reza Shokri
arXiv:2610.27213v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Personalized large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on profile-conditioned inference, pairing public requests with rich, user-specific facts....
By Mingchen Li, Zifan Peng, Kewei Sha, Lavinia F Pieptea, Heng Fan, Junhua Ding, Meikang Qiu, Yunhe Feng