arXiv:2602. 14784v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Breaking long documents into smaller segments is a fundamental challenge in information retrieval.
arXiv:2607. 24767v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems have emerged as a powerful process for allowing large language models (LLMs) to retrieve relevant information to use as source material during text generation.
arXiv:2604. 28076v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have advanced Table Question Answering, where most queries can be answered by extracting information or simple aggregation.
arXiv:2603. 27435v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being used to generate comprehensive, knowledge-intensive reports.
arXiv:2606. 06197v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Question answering (QA) systems have achieved notable progress with the advent of large language models (LLMs).
arXiv:2608. 03148v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: RAG improves the factual grounding of LLM by incorporating external knowledge, but deploying RAG on mobile and edge devices remains challenging because retrieved context increases computation and memory.
arXiv:2607. 01852v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems use the question-answering capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to access information outside their parameters.
arXiv:2607. 02980v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scaling modern large language models (LLMs) to long contexts is limited by the quadratic computation cost, and poor length extrapolation of dense attention.
arXiv:2603. 26667v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) turns external documents into evidence for large language models.
arXiv:2607. 17486v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) process increasingly longer prompts, computation and KV-cache memory costs have emerged as major bottlenecks in inference systems.
arXiv:2608. 16185v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM agents increasingly answer questions over dynamic raw-document collections, where files may change before preprocessing, and relevant evidence (spans, sections, pages, or tables) is query-dependent.
LLM agents increasingly answer questions over dynamic raw-document collections, where files may change before preprocessing, and relevant evidence (spans, sections, pages, or tables) is query-dependent. Existing retrieval-augmented approaches pre-materialize evidence via fixed chunking, embeddings, or persistent indexes: effective for lookup, yet costly, stale-prone, and committed to a granularity before the query is known.
arXiv:2603. 05353v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for long-context question answering is bottlenecked by inference-time prefilling over large retrieved contexts.