arXiv Computation and Language

Modeling the Developmental Shift in Telicity Acquisition

The study introduces a Difference in Surprisal method that uses GPT‑2 token surprisal to automatically label telicity in English CHILDES corpora, validated against expert judgments. Logistic regression classifiers trained on 12 syntactic and lexical semantic features reveal that child speech achieves near‑perfect telicity classification using a single deterministic cue—the presence of a post‑verbal determiner—whereas adult speech relies more on verb class and other lexical semantic features, with the determiner cue neutralized. This developmental trajectory supports syntactic bootstrapping, showing that learners initially exploit high‑frequency structural cues before developing fully compositional, verb‑based event structures.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 27

The Imperfective Paradox Is Not Necessarily in Large Language Models: A Benchmark Failure Before a Model Failure

The paper critiques a recent NLI benchmark that tests the imperfective paradox, arguing that the benchmark suffers from conceptual and evaluation mis-specifications, notably Aspectual Reduction and a lack of strict NLI standards. The authors re-evaluate the benchmark, identify mis-specifications, and construct lexically matched minimal pairs to control for lexical variation. Their experiments reveal that models often exhibit a Sufficiency Bias, accept simple‑past hypotheses without affirming culmination, and that prompting interventions shift label decisions without improving true semantic understanding, highlighting additional failure modes such as compositional aspectual classification errors and surface‑form attraction.

By Kaiqiao Han, Yizhou Sun
arXiv Computation and Language
2d ago

Cross-Linguistic Effects in Bilingual Phoneme BabyLMs

arXiv:2609.37121v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cross-linguistic effects are a central topic in bilingual first-language acquisition. Artificial learners can help investigate L1-L2 interactions by en...

By Nikitas Theodoropoulos, Maria Lymperaiou, Giorgos Filandrianos
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 23

A retrospective analysis on the use of LLMs to study infant syntax learning

The paper reviews how large language models (LLMs) are employed to study infant syntax acquisition, focusing on the BabyLM challenge that aims for human‑level syntactic performance using developmentally realistic corpora. It critically examines dataset construction, model selection, training procedures, and syntactic evaluation methods, highlighting methodological assumptions that limit the theoretical reach of these studies. The authors find that using developmentally realistic corpora has only modest impact on benchmark performance, pointing to fundamental computational differences between LLMs and actual infant syntax learners.

By H\'elie Bazin (SCAI, SND, ISIR), Anouk Barberousse (SND), Fran\c{c}ois Yvon (MLIA)
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 30

BabyHuBERT: Multilingual Self-Supervised Learning for Segmenting Speakers in Child-Centered Long-Form Recordings

arXiv:2509. 15001v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Child-centered daylong recordings are essential for studying early language development, but existing speech models trained on clean adult data perform poorly due to acoustic and linguistic differences.

By Th\'eo Charlot, Tarek Kunze, Maxime Poli, Alejandrina Cristia, Emmanuel Dupoux, Marvin Lavechin
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 3

Disentangling Statistical Preemption from Entrenchment in Language Models' Avoidance of Overgeneralization

The paper investigates how language models avoid overgeneralizations by distinguishing between two types of indirect negative evidence: preemption and entrenchment. Through controlled rearing experiments on models trained on child‑caregiver conversations, the authors find that models do not exhibit verb‑specific preemption but show weak abstract preemption. Analysis of training dynamics suggests that competing structures act as indirect positive evidence rather than negative in the verb‑specific condition.

By Yixuan Wang, Freda Shi, Kanishka Misra
arXiv AI
Aug 11

Beyond Naturalness: Probing Automated Text-To-Speech Evaluators on Linguistically Grounded Dimensions

arXiv:2608. 09930v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automated Text-to-Speech (TTS) evaluation methods (Mean Opinion Score (MOS) predictors and Audio Large Language Models (Audio-LLM) judges) are expected to reflect human perception, yet it is unclear how well they capture the distinct aspects of speech that listeners actually perceive.

By Oluwanifemi Bamgbose, Simon Rosen, Jash Shah, Lindsay Devon Brin, Hoang H Nguyen, Anke Koelzer, Rachel Hansen, Tara Bogavelli, Fanny Riols
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 22

Exposure is Optional: Learning Unlike Coordination in Language Models

Coordination, a fundamental linguistic structure, remains a subject of intense debate, and its exact nature continues to elude theoretical linguistics. A common view holds that only same-category constituents can be conjoined, which has been challenged by the many grammatical unlike coordinations found in natural language.