arXiv AI
Jun 18
CaVe-VLM-CoT: An Interpretable Vision-Language Model Framework
arXiv:2606. 18385v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) remain prone to hallucinations, producing fluent but visually unfaithful outputs.
MPR-CiteG: Enhancing RAG with Multi-Portfolio Retrieval and Citation-Grounded Generation
arXiv:2607. 22706v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper presents the MPR-CiteG framework, which achieved second place in the ScienceON AI Challenge by addressing two fundamental challenges in generative AI: inefficient retrieval and the absence of source verification.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jul 3
PreScience: A Dataset and Benchmark for Scientific Forecasting
arXiv:2602. 20459v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Can AI systems trained on the existing scientific record forecast the advances that will follow?
arXiv AI
Jul 8
Prompt-to-Paper: Agentic AI System for Bioinformatics
arXiv:2607. 05456v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While recent advances in large language models have enabled end-to-end automated manuscript generation, existing systems suffer from three critical deficiencies: (i) generated claims are not deterministically grounded in verifiable literature, (ii) experimental results are frequently fabricated rather than executed, and (iii) there exists no standardized, multi-dimensional framework to assess whether AI-generated manuscripts meet the quality and rigor required for real-world publication.
arXiv AI
Jun 30
How Do LLMs Cite? A Mechanistic Interpretation of Attribution in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
arXiv:2606. 28358v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) aims to enhance the trustworthiness of Large Language Models (LLMs) by grounding their outputs in external documents, often using inline citations for verifiability.
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 13
Mechanism Design for Generative Engines: From Exploitation toward Win-Win Outcomes
arXiv:2608. 11390v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative engines are reshaping the web ecosystem by making citations a key mechanism for allocating attention, attribution, and downstream value.
arXiv AI
Jun 26
ProvenAI: Provenance-Native Traces of Evidence in Generated Answers
arXiv:2606. 26449v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented systems routinely present citations alongside generated answers, yet a citation does not confirm that the corresponding source meaningfully shaped the output.
arXiv AI
4d ago
Reconstruction: A Blind Benchmark for Recovering Research Ideas from Pre-Publication Bibliographies
arXiv:2608. 16645v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Can a language model recover the true research idea of a published paper when given only that paper's pre-publication bibliography?
arXiv AI
Jul 14
STAMP: Provenance-Guided Credit Assignment for Deep Search Agents
arXiv:2607. 11172v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning for deep-search agents has largely focused on trajectory-level scoring -- outcome correctness, citation-aware rewards, and evidence coverage.
arXiv AI
Jun 11
NightFeats @ MMU-RAGent NeurIPS 2025: A Context-Optimized Multi-Agent RAG System for the Text-to-Text Track
arXiv:2606. 11199v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present NightFeats, a structured multi-agent retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system submitted to the MMU-RAGent competition at NeurIPS 2025, where it was awarded Best Dynamic Evaluation in the text-to-text track.
arXiv AI
Jul 24
SciExplore: Evaluating Autonomous Agents from Scientific Navigation to Information Integration
arXiv:2607. 20926v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific research involves complex information-seeking and reasoning workflows across heterogeneous sources.
arXiv AI
Aug 3
Can AI Evaluate AI Scientists? A Benchmarking Study of Autonomous Research Generation Systems Using Automated Multi-Model Review
arXiv:2607. 28631v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI Scientist systems capable of autonomous research have the potential to significantly accelerate scientific discovery.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 23
REFACT: Adaptive Fact Restatement for Compact and Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Large language models increasingly rely on long-form reasoning for complex tasks, yet their reasoning traces may drift away from the supplied context when evidence is sparse, noisy, or in conflict with parametric knowledge. Existing grounding methods either attach citations after generation or encourage evidence retrieval inside the trace, but they often do not ensure that cited content is sufficient for the local inference and final answer.