The paper "Learning to Ideate for Scientific Impact" explores using delayed signals of scientific uptake—specifically citation-normalized impact—as feedback to steer large language models toward generating high‑impact research ideas. The authors build a dataset of over 100,000 computer science papers, train a reward model to predict citation impact from goal‑idea pairs, and align an idea generator via supervised fine‑tuning and reinforcement learning. Evaluation with a reference‑grounded protocol shows that the RL‑tuned model consistently produces ideas with higher estimated impact than baseline models.
By Shubham Kale, Aniketh Garikaparthi, Manasi Patwardhan
arXiv:2605.29522v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: As scientific literature grows rapidly and research increasingly involves AI agents, automated survey generation has become a key capability for bo...
By Ziyue Yang, Da Ma, Hanqi Li, Zijian Wang, Tiancheng Huang, Zijian Hu, Chenrun Wang, Yunzhe Zhang, Xiaobao Wu, Kai Yu, Lu Chen
The paper introduces a method for training large language models to generate diverse, high‑quality scientific ideas grounded in input documents. By using a set‑level reinforcement learning objective that rewards ideas for being distinct from earlier ones, the authors train an 8B model that outperforms Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT‑6 Astra on a contamination‑free benchmark. Human experts rate the model’s idea sets as equally promising while containing slightly more unique ideas, and automated experiments show comparable executability.
By Manya Wadhwa, Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Hiroaki Hayashi, Yu Li, Tuhin Chakrabarty, Chien-Sheng Wu
arXiv:2607.22375v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced the automation of scientific discovery. However, existing systems share a core limitation:...
By Varun Gumma, Navonil Majumder, Soumitra Sinhahajari, Soujanya Poria
The paper introduces CREW, a collaborative multi‑agent reinforcement learning framework that automates the generation of the Related Work Section in research papers. Unlike previous methods that follow a fixed workflow, CREW allows large language model agents to dynamically select actions—Retrieve, Disseminate, Compose, and Critique—guided by a policy trained with Independent Proximal Policy Optimization. Experiments on a standard benchmark show that CREW improves output quality and reduces token usage compared to strong baselines.
By Hai-Dang Dang, Bao-Yen Pham, Bao Nguyen, Tran Thi Huong, Huynh Thi Thanh Binh
arXiv:2510. 24891v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential to accelerate scientific discovery as valuable tools for analyzing data, generating hypotheses, and supporting innovative approaches in various scientific fields.
By Jin Huang, Silviu Cucerzan, Sujay Kumar Jauhar, Ryen W. White