The paper "Learning to Ideate for Scientific Impact" explores using delayed signals of scientific uptake—specifically citation-normalized impact—as feedback to steer large language models toward generating high‑impact research ideas. The authors build a dataset of over 100,000 computer science papers, train a reward model to predict citation impact from goal‑idea pairs, and align an idea generator via supervised fine‑tuning and reinforcement learning. Evaluation with a reference‑grounded protocol shows that the RL‑tuned model consistently produces ideas with higher estimated impact than baseline models.
By Shubham Kale, Aniketh Garikaparthi, Manasi Patwardhan
arXiv:2605.29522v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: As scientific literature grows rapidly and research increasingly involves AI agents, automated survey generation has become a key capability for bo...
By Ziyue Yang, Da Ma, Hanqi Li, Zijian Wang, Tiancheng Huang, Zijian Hu, Chenrun Wang, Yunzhe Zhang, Xiaobao Wu, Kai Yu, Lu Chen
The paper introduces a method for training large language models to generate diverse, high‑quality scientific ideas grounded in input documents. By using a set‑level reinforcement learning objective that rewards ideas for being distinct from earlier ones, the authors train an 8B model that outperforms Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT‑6 Astra on a contamination‑free benchmark. Human experts rate the model’s idea sets as equally promising while containing slightly more unique ideas, and automated experiments show comparable executability.
By Manya Wadhwa, Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Hiroaki Hayashi, Yu Li, Tuhin Chakrabarty, Chien-Sheng Wu
arXiv:2607.22375v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced the automation of scientific discovery. However, existing systems share a core limitation:...
By Varun Gumma, Navonil Majumder, Soumitra Sinhahajari, Soujanya Poria
The paper introduces CREW, a collaborative multi‑agent reinforcement learning framework that automates the generation of the Related Work Section in research papers. Unlike previous methods that follow a fixed workflow, CREW allows large language model agents to dynamically select actions—Retrieve, Disseminate, Compose, and Critique—guided by a policy trained with Independent Proximal Policy Optimization. Experiments on a standard benchmark show that CREW improves output quality and reduces token usage compared to strong baselines.
By Hai-Dang Dang, Bao-Yen Pham, Bao Nguyen, Tran Thi Huong, Huynh Thi Thanh Binh
arXiv:2510. 24891v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential to accelerate scientific discovery as valuable tools for analyzing data, generating hypotheses, and supporting innovative approaches in various scientific fields.
By Jin Huang, Silviu Cucerzan, Sujay Kumar Jauhar, Ryen W. White
arXiv:2602. 02905v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Autonomous agents powered by large language models (LLMs) promise to accelerate scientific discovery end-to-end, but rigorously evaluating their capacity for verifiable discovery remains a central challenge.
By Zhen Wang, Fan Bai, Zhongyan Luo, Jinyan Su, Kaiser Sun, Xinle Yu, Jieyuan Liu, Kun Zhou, Claire Cardie, Mark Dredze, Zhiting Hu, Eric P. Xing
arXiv:2609.07611v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Scientific ideation is the capacity to formulate novel and testable hypotheses from scientific evidence, and autonomous AI scientists depend on it. Exi...
By Yunxiang Mo, Tianshi Zheng, Yisen Gao, Rui Wang, Newt Nguyen Kim Hue Nam, Kelvin Kiu Wai Tam, Jiaxin Bai, Yangqiu Song, Ginny Wong, Simon See
RubricEM is a unified reinforcement learning framework designed for deep research agents that plan, search, evaluate evidence, and synthesize long‑form reports. It introduces rubric‑guided policy decomposition, combining supervised fine‑tuning to scaffold agents with rubrics, stage‑structured GRPO for fine‑grained credit assignment, and a reflection meta‑policy for experience reuse. The resulting RubricEM‑8B model outperforms larger open models on four long‑form research benchmarks and approaches the performance of proprietary deep‑research systems.
By Gaotang Li, Bhavana Dalvi Mishra, Zifeng Wang, Jun Yan, Yanfei Chen, Chun-Liang Li, Long T. Le, Rujun Han, George Lee, Hanghang Tong, Chen-Yu Lee, Tomas Pfister
arXiv:2607. 24850v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled search agents to autonomously tackle complex tasks across extended search and reasoning horizons.
By Lang Mei, Xiaohan Yu, Chong Chen, Liyan Liu, Xiangnan Chen, Jinchao Ma, Chao Feng, Li Huang, Siyu Mo, Sichen Kang, Yunkun Xu, Zhihan Yang, Zhujun Xue, Jingren Zhang, Qing He, Yingdi Huang, Hao Jiang, Ziao Ma, Zewei Pan, Minhao Sun, Zhuo Tao, Jinzhao Xiao, Gangtao Xin, Huanyao Zhang, Wenjian Zhang, Jiangshan Zhang, Guojie Zhu, Fangzhou Zou, Jiaxin Mao, Wentao Zhang
The paper introduces LDC, a framework that learns to generate research ideas with dynamic control. It combines supervised fine‑tuning on paper‑idea pairs with controllable reinforcement learning that optimizes novelty, feasibility, and effectiveness. During inference, sentence‑level controllers steer the generation process to balance these dimensions.
By Ruochen Li, Liqiang Jing, Chi Han, Jiawei Zhou, Xinya Du
arXiv:2610.08781v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Scientific research often begins by synthesizing ideas from a set of related papers to identify gaps and formulate new directions. However, training...
By Ziyu Chen, Yilun Zhao, Jiashuo Sun, Yiling Ma, Manasi Patwardhan, Arman Cohan