arXiv:2609.38486v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) and more broadly Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are often described and understood in human-like terms, a phenomen...
By Ismael T. Freire, Marceau Nahon, Maud van Lier, Katie Evans, H\'elie Bazin, Michele Farisco, Kathinka Evers, Raja Chatila, Mehdi Khamassi
arXiv:2606. 08172v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) increasingly mediate high-stakes interactions in finance, medicine, and mental-health support, yet users have limited control over how these systems communicate.
By Manuele Reani, Hongjian Zhang, Hongyu Tian
arXiv:2606. 05890v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLMs are increasingly deployed as Artificial Moral Advisors (AMA) in a variety of contexts: what kind of conversational patterns should they display?
By Salvatore Greco, Hainiu Xu, Jacopo Domenicucci, Yulan He, Sylvie Delacroix
arXiv:2502.09192v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Anthropomorphism, or the attribution of human traits to technology, is an automatic and unconscious response that occurs even in those with advance...
By Lujain Ibrahim, Myra Cheng
arXiv:2507.19364v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into social simulation has generated considerable enthusiasm, but also raises substantial methodolo...
By Patrick Taillandier, Jean Daniel Zucker, Arnaud Grignard, Benoit Gaudou, Nghi Quang Huynh, Haojia Kong, Alexis Drogoul
arXiv:2606. 11218v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Ethical deliberation is often misunderstood as a search for single right or wrong answers, creating difficulties for non-ethically trained personnel who must address ethically laden challenges.
By Stephen Milford, B. Zara Malgir, Miguel Vazquez
arXiv:2608.30428v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Strategic deception by LLM and VLM agents has emerged as a central AI alignment and safety concern. Social-deduction games (where each player holds a...
By Jaewoo Ahn, Junseo Kim, Hyunseo Kim, Heeseung Yun, Jaehyeon Son, Zsolt Kira, Gunhee Kim
arXiv:2609.37853v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as social agents, yet credible human-like interaction requires more than fluent responses or per...
By Wentao Liu, Xi Chen, Siyu Song, Biao Yuan, Yu Zhang, Zhou Zhuotong, Jingying Zhou, Guohao Feng, Shasha Hu, Tianfu Wang, Shangshang Yang, Haoyang Liu, Youjia Li, Xiaokun Wang, Min Ji, Ji Wang
arXiv:2509.24877v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: The social science of large language models (LLMs) examines how these systems evoke mind attributions, interact with one another, and transform hum...
By Xiao Jia, Zhanzhan Zhao
The paper introduces Synthetic Linguistic Agency (SLA), a framework that defines linguistic agency in terms of embodiment, participation, and precariousness. It presents two studies: one that operationalizes SLA criteria and identifies existing systems, and another that builds an Embodied Mortal Agent (EMA) using mortality‑grounded reinforcement learning. Experiments show the EMA’s linguistic choices depend on its body and social history, influence partner behavior, and adapt over time, demonstrating SLA in an artificial agent.
By Sixin Chen, Taizhou Chen
arXiv:2607. 07824v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have substantially advanced persona-based dialogue agents for emotion-sensitive role simulation in healthcare, education, counseling, customer service, and interactive storytelling.
By Jingyao Cai, Shuaijun Liu, Abdul Rehman, Yutong Guo, Qin Tian, Thomas Dolby, Sue Green, Chantel Cox, Xiaosong Yang
The paper investigates whether large language models (LLMs) replicate socio‑cognitive effects of power asymmetry observed in human communication. By assigning high or low status personas to LLMs in simulated multi‑turn dialogues across diverse professions, the study measures language coordination, pronoun usage, persuasion success, and compliance with unsafe requests. Results indicate that LLMs exhibit key power‑related socio‑cognitive behaviors, though with nuances and variability, linking these simulated interactions to both desirable and unsafe outcomes.
By Anvesh Rao Vijjini, Sagar Manjunath, Snigdha Chaturvedi