arXiv:2606.29121v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Public discourse about artificial intelligence (AI) often uses anthropomorphic language: language that attributes human capabilities and char...
arXiv:2606. 29121v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Public discourse about artificial intelligence (AI) often uses anthropomorphic language: language that attributes human capabilities and characteristics to the system.
arXiv:2502.09192v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Anthropomorphism, or the attribution of human traits to technology, is an automatic and unconscious response that occurs even in those with advance...
arXiv:2601. 09869v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Anthropomorphisation -- the phenomenon whereby non-human entities are ascribed human-like qualities -- has become increasingly salient with the rise of large language model (LLM)-based conversational agents (CAs).
arXiv:2608. 15304v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Frontier agentic systems powered by large language models (LLMs) exhibit human-like patterns of cognition.
arXiv:2608.24748v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: How can humans make sense of the rapid takeoff of artificial intelligence (AI)? We studied the sensemaking dynamics of AI through an open-ended, mixe...
How can humans make sense of the rapid takeoff of artificial intelligence (AI)? We studied the sensemaking dynamics of AI through an open-ended, mixed-methods study with computational text analysis of...
arXiv:2509.24877v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The social science of large language models (LLMs) examines how these systems evoke mind attributions, interact with one another, and transform hum...
arXiv:2608. 10327v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Can AI systems be aligned to human values?
The article discusses the evolution of AI across three generations—from explicit logic to neural networks to large language models (LLMs)—and how LLMs introduce new systemic risks. It applies a forensic‑psychology profiling method to identify ten key features of LLMs, such as hallucinations, bias, and cognitive atrophy, revealing an entity that confabulates, amplifies user biases, and erodes human competence. The report concludes with a four‑pillar framework for AI resilience, emphasizing cognitive sovereignty, measurable control, partial autonomy, and openness to safeguard society.
arXiv:2606. 23991v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: What is an agent?
arXiv:1912. 08786v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Three generations of software have transformed the role of artificial intelligence in society.