Hugging Face Trending Papers

Machine Translation between English and Syriac (East Syriac Dialect) using Statistical Machine Learning

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 28

BHARATI: Morphology-Aware Tokenizers for Classical Indian Languages with Subword Fertility Analysis

arXiv:2607. 23319v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Standard subword tokenization algorithms such as Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE) and SentencePiece are trained predominantly on modern language corpora and produce inefficient segmentations when applied to classical Indian languages.

By Poornima Kumaresan, Pavithra Muruganantham, Lakshmi Rajendran, Santhosh Sivasubramani
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 11

Embedding Initialization for Unseen Low-resource Languages in Multilingual NMT: A Case Study on Limbum-English Translation

arXiv:2608. 07629v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multilingual neural machine translation models such as NLLB-200 cover 200 languages but leave thousands unsupported, including most Grassfields Bantu languages of Cameroon.

By Samiratu Ntohsi, Neza David Tuyishimire, Anesu Kafesu, Marvin Ogore, Samuel Oluwajunwonlo Babalola, Oche Ankeli
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 19

Pearl-Chat: Engineering a native Luganda language model from first principles in JAX and Flax NNX

Pearl-Chat is an 8.5‑million‑parameter causal decoder‑only transformer built from first principles in JAX and Flax NNX, specifically engineered for the low‑resource Bantu language Luganda. It uses a byte‑level BPE tokenizer trained from scratch on curated Luganda corpora, achieving a two‑fold compression improvement over larger models like LLaMA‑3 and Gemma. The model is trained in two stages—pre‑training on diverse Luganda text and instruction fine‑tuning on dialogues—reaching a validation perplexity of 1.20 and high ROUGE‑L and BLEU scores on a held‑out diagnostic benchmark, with all weights, tokenizers, and code released openly.

By Wesley Kambale, Roland Sankara
arXiv Computation and Language
5d ago

Current state of LLMs for Arabic dialectal machine translation

This study evaluates large language models (LLMs) for English‑to‑dialectal Arabic machine translation using the MADAR dataset across 16 Arabic dialects, covering both translation directions. It compares specialized Arabic models (Jais, Nile), multilingual models (Gemma, Command‑R, Mistral, Aya), and commercial APIs (GPT‑4.1) with multiple metrics—BLEU, CHRF, COMET, GEMBA—and a small manual assessment. The authors also examine LLMs’ ability to classify dialects and discuss challenges in automatic MT evaluation for Arabic dialects, noting potential training data contamination.

By Josef Jon, Rawan Bondok, Ond\v{r}ej Bojar