arXiv:2609.10224v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language models such as CLIP embed images and text in a shared space, where modality-specific distributions often remain separated. Existing acc...
arXiv:2507. 18043v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Inference-time steering methods offer a lightweight alternative to fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) by modifying internal activations at test time without updating model weights.
arXiv:2609.18084v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Fine-tuning a Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model for a new deployment environment is expensive, yet most methods apply uniform-capacity adapters to e...
The paper introduces GAVAGAI, a method that adds a referential alignment variable to vision‑language models by solving a small assignment problem via entropic optimal transport. By allowing words to be assigned to a special NOTHING column and enforcing a capacity constraint on regions, the approach improves word‑to‑picture accuracy and localization on the SAYCam infant video corpus. Experiments show that the alignment loss boosts performance over a standard next‑token captioning baseline, especially under high non‑reference rates.
arXiv:2609.00868v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models are evaluated by aggregate accuracy on multimodal benchmarks, a practice that implicitly assumes the model uses its visual inp...
arXiv:2606. 07647v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large vision language models (LVLMs) have made rapid advancements and are deployed across various applications, yet hallucinations remain a major challenge.
arXiv:2604.15678v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Pretrained Vision-Language Models (VLMs) like CLIP show promise in continual learning, but existing Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning (FSCIL) met...
arXiv:2610.34610v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language anomaly detectors describe normal and abnormal appearance with text, and their gains are commonly credited to the semantic content of t...
arXiv:2610.34144v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Fine-tuning adapts pretrained models to new tasks, but identifying which weight changes support the resulting behavior remains difficult. Weight-space...
arXiv:2610.32220v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autoregressive vision-language models (VLMs) struggle to ground generated text in the correct image regions, and existing explainability methods, such...
The paper investigates how finetuning vision‑language models (VLMs) on class‑imbalanced data can severely hurt recall for rare classes, sometimes below zero‑shot performance. It discovers that using a different descriptive prompt at inference—termed cross‑prompt inference—recovers rare‑class recall across diverse VLMs and datasets, though it may slightly affect frequent‑class recall. Analysis with Tuning Contribution shows that cross‑prompt inference reduces reliance on finetuning‑induced computation, shifting the model toward its pretrained knowledge, and that the benefit disappears when the finetuning contribution is minimized.
The paper revisits the use of contrastive loss for post‑training CLIP models, showing that the reported catastrophic forgetting is mainly due to an overly large temperature parameter in the InfoNCE objective. By setting a smaller temperature, contrastive post‑training can actually improve CLIP. The authors introduce ComCLIP, a lightweight single‑epoch recipe that freezes the text encoder, trains the vision encoder with a properly tempered contrastive loss, an MSE anchoring loss, and a relational distillation loss, achieving comparable zero‑shot classification to CLIP‑Refine while significantly enhancing visual feature transferability and maintaining downstream compatibility with LLaVA.