arXiv:2609.23717v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Global vision--language similarities compress an image and a caption into one vector, preserving semantics but not which word corresponds to which regi...
By Liuyang Song, Yi Zhang, Zhongyi Deng, Daqian Yang, Hongbo Zhang
arXiv:2609.10224v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Vision-language models such as CLIP embed images and text in a shared space, where modality-specific distributions often remain separated. Existing acc...
By Zonglin Yang, Huilan Ma, Xudan Zheng, Yuejun Xie
arXiv:2607. 03143v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language alignment powers open-vocabulary recognition, retrieval, and LVLM grounding, yet natural captions are often underspecified, making similarity brittle and overly confident under paraphrase and omitted details.
By Chengzhen Yu, Canran Xiao, Siyuan Ma, Yang Liu
Global vision--language similarities compress an image and a caption into one vector, preserving semantics but not which word corresponds to which region or how those regions are arranged; a model can...
arXiv:2608.28609v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: A personalized agent needs a user memory: a persistent model of who its user is. Today it is almost always text -- transcripts and captions retrieved...
By Bojie Li, Noah Shi
The paper introduces Smol‑VL‑BLV, a compact vision‑language model designed for blind and low‑vision users. It employs a 500M decoder transformer with teacher‑student distillation and Group Relative Policy Optimization to add spatial detail, directional cues, and hazard detection to post‑training. After a lightweight finetuning step, the model achieves significant gains on spatial, social, OCR, and VQA benchmarks while remaining under 450 MB and running entirely offline on a mid‑range Android phone.
By Rishabh Choudhary, Shreyansh Raj, Umesh Goyal, Shubh Kashyap, Shrestha Kumar, Sushovan Jena, Komal Kumar, Hisham Cholakkal, Aditya Nigam