arXiv Machine Learning
The Visual Insensitivity Gap: Diagnosing When Vision-Language Models Fail to Use Visual Evidence
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Aug 17
Beyond aggregate scores: Deployment-aware and non-compensatory benchmarking of vision-based eye-state recognition models for driver monitoring
arXiv:2606. 08123v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Model selection for safety-relevant visual recognition is often based on clean aggregate performance, although robustness, transfer, embedded latency, and explanation faithfulness may produce different preferences.
arXiv AI
Aug 25
E2S-Pruner: Progressive Two-Stage Evidence Fusion for Visual Token Pruning in Vision-Language Models
arXiv:2608.23253v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models typically encode an image into hundreds of visual tokens, incurring substantial inference latency and GPU memory overhead. Exi...
arXiv AI
Jul 28
Are Prompt Optimizers Blind? Cross-Modal Visual Feedback for Automatic Prompt Optimization
arXiv:2607. 24354v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automatic prompt optimization (APO) has been widely adopted to adapt vision-language models (VLMs) to downstream tasks without weight updates, yielding promising results.
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 27
Seeing or Knowing? Visual Context Sensitivity in Multimodal Large Language Models
The paper investigates why multimodal large language models (MLLMs) struggle with vision‑centric tasks when visual evidence conflicts with pretrained language knowledge. Using image reconstruction and a new WhatIfVis benchmark, the authors show that MLLMs preserve coarse‑grained visual attributes but fail to consistently use them, and that supervised fine‑tuning and activation patching can improve controllability of visual context sensitivity. The study demonstrates that the main bottleneck lies in the models’ inability to reliably regulate their reliance on visual evidence rather than in visual perception itself.
arXiv Computation and Language
3d ago
Where Do Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders Fail on Low-Resource Languages?
arXiv:2608.30725v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent multilingual vision--language encoders cover hundreds of languages in a single model, yet on two state-of-the-art instances retrieval on low-res...
arXiv AI
Jul 16
Accuracy Without Grounding: Diagnosing Visual Dependency Dissociation in Video LLM Benchmarks
arXiv:2607. 13305v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Benchmark accuracy in video large language models (LLMs) is often treated as evidence of visual understanding.