Linguistics-Aware Non-Distortionary LLM Watermarking
arXiv:2606. 00613v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Watermarking should identify language-model output without degrading quality or limiting verification to the model provider.
TextSeal2 is a distortion‑free watermarking method for large language models that maintains signal integrity during speculative decoding. It merges multiple keys into a single virtual key using a Gaussian copula, ensuring that the acceptance rate and output diversity remain unchanged while adding no measurable inference latency. Experiments on three LLMs show that TextSeal2 detects 8–22 percentage points more 100‑token answers than its predecessor TextSeal and outperforms textGrain under speculative decoding, all without post‑logits optimization.
arXiv:2606. 00613v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Watermarking should identify language-model output without degrading quality or limiting verification to the model provider.
arXiv:2606. 18430v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Statistical watermarks help organizations attribute large language model (LLM) outputs, yet existing detectors often struggle when watermark signals are weak, texts are repetitive, or watermarks are edited.
arXiv:2610.27653v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Watermarking has emerged as a key tool for identifying text generated by large language models (LLMs), with current schemes embedding statistical sig...
arXiv:2508.03829v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The growing deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) has raised concerns about their misuse in generating harmful or deceptive content. To addres...
arXiv:2603. 18482v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Standard decoding strategies for text generation, including top-$k$, nucleus sampling, and contrastive search, select tokens based on likelihood, restricting outputs to high-probability regions.
arXiv:2608. 03839v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Training-free speculative decoding drafts by matching an exact suffix of the context against a pool of earlier context.
The paper investigates how speculative decoding—where a draft model proposes multiple future tokens that are then verified by the target model—affects energy consumption in large language model serving under latency constraints. It finds that energy savings depend heavily on the acceptance rate of drafted tokens, which varies by model architecture, drafting scheme, and the type of text (e.g., conversation vs. code, English vs. Romansh). The study shows that while speculation can reduce energy per token at small batch sizes, at larger batches the verification cost dominates, potentially turning speculation into an energy loss, especially when acceptance rates are low.
Speedbumps: Rejection Attacks on Speculative Decoding explores how Speculative Rejection Attacks (SRAs) can degrade the efficiency of speculative decoding by causing draft and target models to disagree more often, leading to more target-model forward passes per token. The authors introduce two attacks—Speedbump-P and Speedbump-D—that append adversarial suffixes to attacker-controlled content, optimizing the expected length of the accepted speculative prefix. In some scenarios, these attacks slow inference below autoregressive decoding, reduce output quality, yet remain effective under sampling and transfer across drafters or target models sharing a drafter.
MarkTune is a model‑embedded watermarking framework that improves the trade‑off between generation quality and detectability. By regularizing toward a high‑quality reference distribution, it decouples quality preservation from proximity to the base model and uses the GaussMark detection statistic as a reward during on‑policy fine‑tuning. Empirical results show that MarkTune enhances the quality‑detectability frontier, maintains downstream task performance, and remains robust against text‑editing and open‑weight attacks across diverse datasets.
arXiv:2603. 23171v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Providers monitor deployed large language models (LLMs) to detect misuse that they cannot prevent.
arXiv:2607. 10252v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly consumed through opaque serving chains - API aggregators, resellers, and inference providers - in which the client has no technical means to confirm that the model answering is the model advertised, and recent audits show that a substantial fraction of commercial endpoints deviate from the vendor's reference weights.
The paper introduces "watermarkability," a metric that quantifies how compatible a language model is with a logit‑based watermark that boosts the probability of a specified token set during decoding. By measuring the expected minimum KL divergence needed to achieve a target probability mass, the authors can assess and compare models and watermark rules. They propose a two‑stage approach—first training a low‑rank adapter conditioned on the target set, then applying a minimal uniform logit bias—to reduce this cost, achieving significant perplexity reductions across multiple watermark schedules on OPT‑125M and Qwen3‑8B.