arXiv:2609.39488v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Flow matching generates samples by gradually transforming noise into data. In practice, using a finite number of sampling steps introduces a numerical...
By Ron Levy, Michael Elad
arXiv:2609.17287v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: In flow matching (FM), a velocity model $v_{\theta}$ is trained using a predefined path $g_t$ that connects data and noise samples (e.g., $g_t(x_0, x_1...
By Alexander Tyurin
GeoSPRINT is a training‑free framework that constructs non‑uniform sampling schedules for diffusion model inference by detecting geometrically redundant steps in denoising trajectories. It uses a hyperplanarity test in latent space, implemented via QR factorization, to allocate more steps to high‑curvature regions, and introduces the trajectory projection score α_traj as a model‑free diagnostic for flow quality. Across CIFAR‑10, LSUN Church, and Stable Diffusion v1.5, GeoSPRINT consistently outperforms uniform DDIM schedules at matched NFE budgets, improving FID scores by up to 1.93 points.
By Arpita Joshi
arXiv:2606. 31063v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Gaussian process inference is often limited by cubic computational costs, a challenge that becomes more pronounced in spatio-temporal settings where posterior inference is required over dense grids.
By Rui-Yang Zhang, Lachlan Astfalck, Edward Cripps, David Leslie, Henry Moss
The paper introduces Difficulty-Calibrated Flow Matching, a method that adapts the noise-to-data interpolation schedule in Conditional Flow Matching based on a pilot run’s loss profile. By setting the schedule to the quantile function of this difficulty profile, the training trajectory spends more time where the velocity is hardest to learn. Experiments on CIFAR-10, MNIST, and Fashion‑MNIST show that this calibrated path achieves the best FID on CIFAR‑10 and outperforms all fixed schedules in large‑batch, few‑update settings, where compute is most limited.
By Airin Akter Tania, Md Raihan Khan
arXiv:2607. 28864v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tree-based diffusion models fit flexible conditional predictive distributions for tabular regression without a neural density estimator, but they inherit their design defaults---noising path, parameterization, training distribution, features, sampler---from the neural setting.
By Silas Koemen
Flow matching trains a neural network to regress the conditional velocity along a linear interpolant between noise and data, and the number of network evaluations~(NFE) sets the cost of sampling. The straight-line interpolant carries an implicit choice: the sample moves at constant speed throughout the trajectory.
arXiv:2607. 26285v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Two central challenges in diffusion-based sampling are the theoretical one of understanding their remarkable effectiveness even in high-dimensional settings, and the practical one of designing algorithms with certified performance guarantees.
By Martin J. Wainwright
arXiv:2605. 00941v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Flow matching has become a leading framework for generative modeling, but quantifying the uncertainty of its samples remains an open problem.
By Jiarui Xing, Song Wang, Jian Wang
arXiv:2606. 04092v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Flow matching models learn to transport samples from a simple prior distribution to a complex data distribution.
By Shimon Malnick, Matan Rusanovsky, Ohad Fried, Shai Avidan
arXiv:2607. 13841v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Heavy-tailed data arise in many domains where rare events carry disproportionate importance, such as imbalanced image datasets, financial returns, and weather extremes.
By Zhouhao Yang, Yezhen Wang, Kenji Kawaguchi, Vladimir Braverman, Haoyang Cao
arXiv:2609.38918v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Flow Matching (FM) learns a velocity field whose ODE transports a simple source distribution to a target law. Existing finite-sample theory largely t...
By Lifeng Hao, Shaolin Ji