AI safety and alignment

Alignment, interpretability, red-teaming, bias and privacy: the research on what these systems do when they misbehave.

17,798 stories · RSS feed

arXiv AI
Sep 23

Toward Auditable and Calibrated AI for Dementia-Related Crash Severity Prediction: A Selective Deferral Framework to Support Human Review

The paper presents a decision‑aware framework for predicting dementia‑related crash severity that emphasizes auditability and selective deferral. Using 4,781 Texas crash records, the authors evaluate several models—including structured, narrative, fusion, calibrated fusion, BERT‑family, and local large‑language‑model baselines—under a stratified 70/15/15 split. The leakage‑controlled Gemma model achieves the highest macro‑F1 of 0.545, while a calibrated fusion model reaches 0.522 macro‑F1 with an expected calibration error of 0.033; selective deferral further improves performance, raising macro‑F1 to 0.573 at 70% coverage and reducing severity cost to 0.577.

By Gaurab Chhetri, Anika Baitullah, Subasish Das
arXiv AI
Sep 23

Beyond Predictable Paths: Redefining AI Security Incident Reporting for Agents

The paper discusses the need to adapt incident reporting frameworks for AI agents, which are rapidly deployed and face unique security challenges. By comparing AI systems and agents and consulting 23 experts, the authors identify key reporting elements such as agent memory, autonomy levels, and tool usage. They also highlight open research questions, potential reporting weaknesses like data leakage, and outline privacy requirements for secure AI agent deployment.

By Anastasia Pustozerova, Eugene Bagdasarian, Luca Beurer-Kellner, Battista Biggio, Nico Ebert, David Filip, Marc Fischer, Heather Frase, David Hofer, Juliane Hoffmann, Daphne Ippolito, Somesh Jha, Sean McGregor, Esfandiar Mohammadi, Luca Nannini, Cristina Nita-Rotaru, Alina Oprea, Kevin Paeth, Andrew Paverd, Jonathan Petit, Andreas Rauber, Christian Riess, John Sotiropoulos, Andreas Wespi, Kathrin Grosse
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23

The Probabilistic Structure of Large Language Models

The paper offers a unified probabilistic framework for large language models, describing them as probability measures over token sequences defined by autoregressive conditional distributions. Training is cast as maximum‑likelihood estimation solved via stochastic gradient methods, while generation is treated as sequential simulation of the resulting stochastic process. It also explores how the asymmetry of the Kullback–Leibler divergence relates to hallucination and the distinction between plausibility and truth, and extends the perspective to diffusion models that generate data by simulating a reverse‑time stochastic process.

By Adnan Aboulala\^a
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23

FairMean: Promoting Fairness in Distributed Learning under Label Poisoning Attacks

FairMean is a new approach for distributed learning that addresses the conflict between fairness and robustness to label poisoning attacks. It assigns weights to client gradients based on a bounded, nondecreasing function of local loss, giving higher weight to high‑loss clients to promote fairness while limiting the influence of poisoned clients. The method is shown to improve fairness compared to standard average‑loss minimization and to reduce accuracy variance while boosting worst‑client accuracy in experiments.

By Huigan Zheng, Jiaojiao Zhang, Yongxiang Liu
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23

Empirical Auditing of Edge-Private Graph Generators

The paper presents an empirical audit of privacy leakage in edge‑private graph generators by testing whether outputs from edge‑neighbouring inputs remain distinguishable. It introduces statistically valid lower bounds on privacy loss and compares direct‑edge, local‑structural, and GNN‑based attacks based on the geometry around a target edge. Experiments on two generators and two networks reveal that privacy leakage varies with both the mechanism and the network, and that learned representations expose information beyond conventional local statistics.

By Anum Fatima, Stratis Limnios, James Adams, Lukasz Szpruch, Carsten Maple, Gesine Reinert, Andrew Elliott
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 23

KwaiMind Technical Report

KwaiMind is a commercial image editing system that combines general editing capabilities with e-commerce specialization. It uses an agent-based data engine with 1.8 million editing pairs and a multimodal diffusion transformer trained through pre‑training, fine‑tuning, preference optimization, and online reinforcement learning. The system is guided by a vision‑language judge and specialized rewards for click‑through rate, text rendering, and product consistency, and it achieves top scores on ImgEdit, GEdit, REDEdit, and the new Ecom‑Bench, while improving predicted and actual CTR in offline and online experiments.

By Junlong Wu, Zijun Li, Yuting Hu, Jia Sun, Pengcheng Wei, Yimin Zhou, Honglie Wang, Huaiqing Wang, Dewen Fan, Fei Zuo, Haixuan Gao, Lihui Peng, Tingxuan She, Yuqing Li, Boheng Zhang, Fan Yang, Wenwu Ou