arXiv:2607. 08046v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models fine-tuned for forecasting can be accurate yet poorly calibrated, and their chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning may not faithfully reflect the evidence behind a forecast.
By Rapha\"el Sarfati, Pratyush Ranjan Tiwari, Siddharth Boppana, Christopher J. Earls, Srikar Varadaraj, Eric Ho
arXiv:2607. 08409v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based ASR adapted to regulated domains such as banking is bottlenecked by privacy: real speech is costly and legally constrained to collect, making synthetic text-to-speech (TTS) an attractive substitute.
By Shashi Kumar, Yanis Labrak, Hasindri Watawana, Sergio Burdisso, Esa\'u Villatoro-Tello, Kadri Hacio\u{g}lu, Petr Motlicek, Andreas Stolcke
arXiv:2604. 07102v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Activation-based steering enables inference-time personalization of large language models, but its effects in educational applications are not well understood.
By Yongchao Wu, Aron Henriksson
arXiv:2607. 08741v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generating realistic 3D human motions in real-time within interactive applications is key for animation, simulation, and humanoid robotics.
By Kaifeng Zhao, Mathis Petrovich, Haotian Zhang, Tingwu Wang, Siyu Tang, Davis Rempe
arXiv:2607. 08066v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring is a promising safety mechanism for AI agents, based on the premise that visible reasoning traces can surface misaligned or deceptive behavior.
By Jennifer Za, Julija Bainiaksina, Nikita Ostrovsky, Tanush Chopra, Victoria Krakovna
arXiv:2607. 08152v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: On the recent EyeBench benchmark, predicting reading comprehension from eye movements exposes a stark gap: text-aware models using pretrained language models reach 56--63% AUROC, while gaze-only models operate at chance.
By Sumin Lee, Kyeonghun Kim, Subeen Lee, Jiwon Yang, Tien Nguyen, Ken Ying-Kai Liao, Nam-Joon Kim
arXiv:2607. 08565v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM scheduling is critical to serving, yet it remains unclear how well existing designs fit agentic serving--with LLM requests issued by agents instead of humans.
By Jiahao Wang, Kaizhan Lin, Kaixi Zhang, Jinbo Han, Xingda Wei, Sijie Shen, Chenguang Fang, Wenyuan Yu, Rong Chen, Haibo Chen
arXiv:2607. 08456v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A model should refuse two different things: answers it would get wrong, and questions it should not answer at all, such as unanswerable ones or ones resting on a false premise.
By Benedikt J. Wagner
arXiv:2607. 08034v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are used worldwide, yet disproportionately reflect Western values, limiting their ability to represent diverse value systems.
By Dhruv Agarwal, Anya Shukla, Tanya Goyal, Aditya Vashistha
arXiv:2607. 08400v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM agents reach users through resellers, who may rebrand a developer's agent or substitute a cheaper model.
By Zheng Gao, Xiaoyu Li, Xiaoyan Feng, Jiaojiao Jiang, Yang Song, Yulei Sui, Zhenchang Xing, Liming Zhu
arXiv:2607. 08754v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Low-rank factorization is widely used to compress neural networks, but modern models are often not naturally amenable to aggressive factorization without significant accuracy loss.
By David Gonz\'alez-Mart\'inez, Shiwei Liu
arXiv:2607. 08282v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) have become essential productivity tools, their integration into workflows without adequate safeguards creates significant risks.
By Hugo Garc\'ia Cuesta, Pablo Mateo Torrej\'on, Alfonso S\'anchez-Maci\'an
arXiv:2607. 08511v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Choosing a learning rate scheduling strategy is critical to neural network training, but manual selection is costly and rarely exhaustive.
By Hafsa Mateen, Radu Timofte, Dmitry Ignatov
arXiv:2607. 08038v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Diagnostic error is a major threat to patient safety, yet current large language model (LLM) systems often treat diagnosis as a one-shot prediction task, lacking safeguards against missed high-risk alternatives or rigorous verification of their reasoning.
By Fan Ma, Mauro Giuffr\`e, Donald Wright, Kent McCann, Mark Iscoe, Lingfei Qian, Mingyang Jiang, Chi Wing Ng, Na Hong, Huan He, Cathy Shyr, Qingyu Chen, Lee Schwamm, Lucila Ohno-Machado, Hua Xu
arXiv:2607. 07891v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Roy Harris's Integrationist linguistics offers a compelling critique of the referentialist tradition embedded deep at the heart of computational approaches to language, arguing that language is not a code that maps onto a pre-given world but a situated, bipartite activity oriented toward prospective joint action.
By J. Mark Bishop, Stephen J. Cowley
arXiv:2607. 07846v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: VectorizationLLM is a specialized Large Language Model based on Google open-weight LLMs.
By Ryan Duke
arXiv:2607. 08018v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLMs often struggle to balance compositionality with knowledgeability, a challenge we define as Composition-Knowledge Dichotomy.
By Changhun Lee, Minguk Jeon, Jongkyung Shin, Chiehyeon Lim
arXiv:2607. 07989v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) based multi-agent systems enable complex problem solving through coordinated reasoning and action, but their distributed structure also introduces new challenges in diagnosing system-level failures.
By Yufei Xia, Anjun Gao, Yueyang Quan, Zhuqing Liu, Minghong Fang
arXiv:2607. 07740v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern LLMs are increasingly deployed in long-context applications such as retrieval-augmented generation, repository-level coding, and agentic workflows whose accumulated reasoning and tool traces routinely push the input an order of magnitude past the pretraining window, making zero-shot context extension the dominant deployment path for open-weight checkpoints.
By Haozhan Tang, Zerui Wang, Yuxian Gu, Song Han, Han Cai
arXiv:2607. 08284v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated rapidly improving long-context capabilities, prompting a wave of benchmarks designed to evaluate them.
By Siddhartha Jain, Ameya Velingker