Benchmarks and evaluation

Leaderboards, eval harnesses and ablations — the contested business of deciding which model is actually better.

24,477 stories · RSS feed

arXiv AI
Jun 4

TamperBench: Systematically Stress-Testing LLM Safety Under Fine-Tuning and Tampering

arXiv:2602. 06911v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: As increasingly capable open-weight large language models (LLMs) are deployed, improving their tamper resistance against unsafe modifications, whether accidental or intentional, becomes critical to minimize risks.

By Saad Hossain, Tom Tseng, Punya Syon Pandey, Samanvay Vajpayee, Matthew Kowal, Nayeema Nonta, Samuel Simko, Stephen Casper, Zhijing Jin, Kellin Pelrine, Sirisha Rambhatla
arXiv AI
Jun 4

FinTradeBench: A Financial Reasoning Benchmark for LLMs

arXiv:2603. 19225v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Real-world financial decision-making is a challenging problem that requires reasoning over heterogeneous signals, including company fundamentals derived from regulatory filings and trading signals computed from price dynamics.

By Yogesh Agrawal, Aniruddha Dutta, Md Mahadi Hasan, Santu Karmaker, Aritra Dutta
arXiv AI
Jun 4

LoopFM: Learning frOm HistOrical RePresentations of Foundation Model for Recommendation

arXiv:2605. 29280v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Knowledge distillation (KD) transfers a single scalar prediction from a large foundation model (FM) to compact vertical models (VMs), suffering from diminishing transfer ratio -- the fraction of FM improvement captured by the VM -- as a single scalar cannot convey the rich intermediate knowledge that larger FMs learn.

By Shali Jiang, Hua Zheng, Boyang Liu, Laming Chen, Kenny Lov, Chuanqi Xu, Lisang Ding, Qinghai Zhou, Can Cui, Xiaolong Liu, Xiaoyi Liu, Yasmine Badr, Xin Xu, Jiyan Yang, Ellie Dingqiao Wen, Gerard Jonathan Mugisha Akkerhuis, Chenxiao Guan, Rong Jin, Ruichao Qiu, Xian Chen, Shifu Xu, Zhehui Zhou, Ping Chen, Rui Yang, Haicheng Chen, Xiangge Meng, Song Zhou, Dharak Kharod, Shuyu Xu, Qiang Jin, Qiao Yang, Wankun Zhu, Qin Huang, Yuzhen Huang, Darren Liu, Parish Aggarwal, Hui Zhou, Erzhuo Wang, Shuo Chang, Xiaorui Gan, Wenlin Chen, Santanu Kolay, Huayu Li
arXiv AI
Jun 4

Plan, Watch, Recover: A Benchmark and Architectures for Proactive Procedural Assistance

arXiv:2606. 04970v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We envision a proactive multi-modal assistant system which gives users real-time step-by-step guidance on a procedural task, autonomously deciding \textit{when} to interrupt, and \textit{how} to coach.

By Kaustav Kundu, Ritvik Shrivastava, Maxim Arap, Nanshu Wang, Xianhui Zhu, Quintin Fettes, Gautam Tiwari, Parth Suresh, Th\'eo Moutakanni, Alejandro Castillejo Munoz, Allen Bolourchi, Pascale Fung, Pinar Donmez, Babak Damavandi, Anuj Kumar, Seungwhan Moon
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 3

Self-Evaluation Is Already There: Eliciting Latent Judge Calibration in Base LLMs with Minimal Data

Large language models are increasingly evaluated by other models, raising a natural question: can a model predict how a judge will score its own output? We find that the ability is largely present before any targeted training: prompted few-shot, a base model already predicts an external judge's multi-attribute quality scores on open-ended responses well above chance across three benchmarks.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 3

RePercENT: Scaling Disentangled Representation Learning Beyond Two Modalities

To leverage the full potential of multimodal data, we need representations that go beyond the state-of-the-art alignment and fusion approaches and exploit all cross-modal interactions without sacrificing modality-specific information. Learning disentangled representations is a principled way to identify these underlying shared and unique factors that are hidden in observational data.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 3

AutoLab: Can Frontier Models Solve Long-Horizon Auto Research and Engineering Tasks?

Scientific and engineering progress is fundamentally a long-horizon iterative process: proposing changes, running experiments, measuring outcomes, and continuously refining artifacts. Yet existing benchmarks for frontier models primarily evaluate either single-turn responses or short-horizon agent trajectories, failing to capture the challenges of sustained iterative improvement over extended time horizons.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 3

New Benchmarking Shows Limited Generalization Power of TCR Antigenic Epitope Prediction Models

Accurate computational prediction of T cell receptor (TCR) antigen specificity would transform the study of T cell biology and enable scalable immune engineering, yet existing models lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity for broad applications. A major limitation is the absence of rigorously defined, unseen benchmark datasets that allow unbiased evaluation of model performance and generalizability.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 3

Plan, Watch, Recover: A Benchmark and Architectures for Proactive Procedural Assistance

We envision a proactive multi-modal assistant system which gives users real-time step-by-step guidance on a procedural task, autonomously deciding \textit{when} to interrupt, and \textit{how} to coach. However, progress is limited by the absence of large-scale, cross-domain benchmarks that reflect realistic conditions, particularly the common case in which users deviate from the expected step sequence.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 3

BreastGPT: A Multimodal Large Language Model for the Full Spectrum of Breast Cancer Clinical Routine

Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women. Its clinical management requires multimodal reasoning across a clinical workflow that spans \textit{screening}, \textit{diagnosis} and \textit{treatment planning}, where each stage involves distinct imaging modalities, task objectives, and reasoning patterns.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 3

BiasGRPO: Stabilizing Bias Mitigation in High-Variance Reward Landscapes via Group-Relative Policy Optimization

Mitigating social bias in Large Language Models (LLMs) presents a distinct alignment challenge: unlike verifiable tasks, bias lacks a single ground truth, creating a high-variance, subjective reward landscape. Previous preference-based fine-tuning methods have major trade-offs: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is limited by the lack of exploration inherent in offline training, while Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) can lead to training instability due to potentially unreliable critic estimates.