AI agents

Tool use, function calling, orchestration and the protocols that let models act rather than only answer.

15,750 stories · RSS feed

arXiv AI
Sep 15

Toward Self-Adaptive Physical AI: Can LLM Agents Manage Long-Horizon Physical Tasks?

The paper investigates whether large language model (LLM) agents can autonomously manage long‑horizon physical tasks without human intervention. It proposes a multi‑agent framework that combines planning, tool calling, observation, and verification, and tests it on agricultural tasks under varying weather conditions. Results show that zero‑shot LLM agents match reinforcement learning (RL) agents in the same environment and outperform RL when the environment shifts, suggesting a viable path for self‑adaptive physical AI.

By Varun Kaushik, Yayun Tan, Xiaofan Yu
arXiv AI
Sep 15

Homeostatic Continual Learning

The paper introduces a new approach called Homeostatic Continual Learning, designed to allow an AI agent to learn continuously in a changing environment without catastrophic forgetting. The method identifies outliers in environmental data when the agent’s output deviates, enabling the agent to incrementally refine its model and policy across increasingly diverse contexts. The authors also propose extending the method to build a world model that factorizes objects into features, abstracts them into comparable concept instances, and maps concepts to intents via features, while outlining necessary future work and broader AI connections.

By Yue Jin
arXiv AI
Sep 15

DynSTEER: Dynamic Stage-wise Trajectory Evaluation and Execution-time Review for Agents

DynSTEER is a dynamic stage‑wise trajectory evaluation framework designed for large language model agents performing long‑horizon tasks. It segments rollouts into stages anchored by key actions, uses a path‑tolerant milestone graph to accommodate diverse valid strategies, and adaptively routes queries to multi‑tier judges while halting unrecoverable executions early. Experiments show it improves evaluation discriminability by 85.2% over native methods, separates all model pairs with statistical significance, and saves 34.51% of execution steps on failed rollouts.

By Zhichao Shi, Wenjie Zhang, Xuhui Jiang, Xiaojun Wu, Cehao Yang, Chengjin Xu, Jian Guo, Yuanzhuo Wang
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 15

MUSE: A Theory-Harnessed Story Engine for Vibe Narrativizing

MUSE is a story‑generation engine that applies Robert McKee’s narrative theory to guide decisions about plot, character, and language throughout planning, drafting, and revision. It structures story knowledge into rule atoms, semantic consolidations, and mechanisms, and uses intermediate deliverables to preserve decisions across creative stages. Experiments show MUSE improves benchmark scores over zero‑shot generation and maintains low consistency errors across multiple models.

By Jianxiang Ma, Xiaocui Yang, Daling Wang, Yuesong Hou, Mingfu Zhang, Yichen Gao, Junzhao Huang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 15

Discrete Beckmann Transport Models for One-Step Language Modeling and Reasoning

Discrete Beckmann Transport Models (DBTM) are introduced as a new type of discrete diffusion and flow model that can generate language in a single step by mapping any point to a fixed point on the simplex vertices. Unlike previous approaches, DBTM eliminates the need for a pretrained teacher model and time conditioning by minimizing a conservation equation directly from data. The model can be partially trained and iterated until convergence, and it can be extended to a partial‑context interpolant that refines outputs with additional function evaluations. Experiments on language modeling and reasoning tasks show that DBTM achieves higher quality and accuracy than existing discrete diffusion and continuous flow baselines.

By Sophia Tang, Shiyi Wang
arXiv AI
Sep 15

Generative Interpretability via Scalable Neuro-Symbolic Models

The paper argues that as Large Language Models transition from chatbots to agentic systems, the current post-hoc interpretability paradigm is insufficient for safe deployment because it cannot audit or intervene before an output is produced. It proposes a shift to generative interpretability, where a model’s inference process inherently exposes semantically meaningful checkpoints that are human-understandable and can be causally intervened upon. The authors illustrate the advantages of this approach and introduce Neuro‑Symbolic Models as a concrete implementation.

By Xiaocong Yang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 15

GRADE: Graph Representation of LLM Agent Dependency and Execution

The paper introduces GRADE, a graph-based representation of large language model (LLM) agent executions that captures both execution steps and their dependencies. By adding graded dependency edges—observed, declared, or inferred—to the trace, the authors evaluate how this dependency layer affects failure prediction across six corpora involving tool use, coding, and web tasks. Experiments show that the dependency block can improve prediction in some settings, but its effectiveness varies with the evaluation probe and corpus, and controlled experiments demonstrate that the observed structure is not merely a degree-matched artifact.

By Yue Zhao
arXiv AI
Sep 15

Root-Cause Attribution Is a Search Problem: Continual Search for Long-Horizon Agent Failures

The paper introduces Continual Search, an iterative framework that guides large language models to persistently search for diagnostic evidence in long AI agent execution logs, addressing the limitations of one-shot judgments. Evaluated on four existing RCA benchmarks and a new large-scale dataset called MegaRCA-Mix, Continual Search consistently boosts attribution performance, achieving a 40% F1 improvement for GPT‑5.5 on MegaRCA‑Mix. The results show that effective search can outweigh raw model scale, enabling lower-tier models to outperform higher-tier ones in root‑cause attribution tasks.

By Harsh Raj, David Lee, Anas Mahmoud, Renxiong Wang, Razvan-Gabriel Dumitru, Chenguang Wang, Tong Zhao, Yunzhong He, Darvin Yi, Vipul Gupta
arXiv AI
Sep 15

Evaluation Metrics for Safe Reinforcement Learning

The paper introduces new evaluation metrics for safe reinforcement learning that go beyond average safety guarantees by examining how often and how severely safety bounds are violated, consistency across tasks and bounds, and the relationship between training-time and final policy behavior. It also proposes a safety tier system for categorizing algorithms and presents empirical safety evaluations on multiple navigation tasks. The authors recommend reporting aggregate metrics, distributional data, and task‑specific results together, and provide an open‑source suite, SafeRLEval, to facilitate reliable safety assessment.

By Lindsay Spoor, Aske Plaat, Thomas Moerland
Simon Willison
Sep 14

Quoting Laurie Voss

Laurie Voss argues that while the cost of writing code has fallen dramatically, the costs of reviewing, fixing, and operating software are rising and will continue to do so. She emphasizes that the true expense lies in understanding user needs, precisely defining requirements, and ensuring a pleasant user experience—costs that are unique to each software product and do not scale with reuse. As software demand grows without an upper limit, these user‑centric costs will dominate the overall development effort.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

FINESSE: An Agent-Based Simulator and Benchmark Dataset for Multimodal Financial Event Sequences

FINESSE is an agent‑based simulation framework that generates synthetic, structured datasets of multiple interdependent financial event streams, such as transactions, payments, account status changes, and policy interventions. Each stream has its own action space, schema, and variable types, and the streams are coupled through agents’ evolving latent states, allowing temporally rich interactions. The accompanying FINESSE‑Bench dataset supports four tasks—balance forecasting, transaction fraud detection, missed payment prediction, and next event prediction—and baseline results are provided using various time‑series and event‑sequence methods.

By Tyler Farnan, Benjamin Eng, Adam Abate, Xirui Hou, Rizal Fathony, Nam H. Nguyen, Senthil Kumar