arXiv AI By Dayu Wang, Jiaye Yang, Weikang Li, Jiahui Liang, Yang Li, Deguo Xia, Jizhou Huang

Woodpecker Distillation: Weak Models Diagnose Reasoning Bugs in Strong Models

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2608. 05168v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models often fail on reasoning tasks despite possessing the capability to solve them.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 5

ReflectRL: Learning from Golden Negative Trajectories via Reflective-to-Direct Reasoning

arXiv:2608. 03972v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: On-policy training has emerged as a powerful post-training paradigm for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models, and is often enhanced by golden trajectories from stronger expert models.

By Jinhe Bi, Chennan Zhou, Zengjie Jin, Aniri, Shuo Lu, Wenke Huang, Hu Cao, Xun Xiao, Zhihong Zhu, Volker Tresp, Fei Shen, Yunpu Ma, Tat-Seng Chua
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 4

ReflectRL: Learning from Golden Negative Trajectories via Reflective-to-Direct Reasoning

On-policy training has emerged as a powerful post-training paradigm for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models, and is often enhanced by golden trajectories from stronger expert models. However, when the expert fails on harder problems, existing trajectory-guided methods lose their main source of supervision, and these failed trajectories are typically discarded as negative samples.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 25

Reasoning Quality Emerges Early: Data Curation for Reasoning Models

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on a small, high-quality set of long reasoning traces is an effective approach for eliciting strong reasoning capabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing methods for curating high-quality SFT data rely heavily on strong reasoning models to filter examples based on diversity and difficulty, making the curation process costly while often yielding suboptimal data quality.