WisdomNet: trustable machine learning toward error-free classification
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2608. 09768v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A prediction that is both confident and wrong is a critical reliability failure because it can bypass abstention and human review precisely when the model is mistaken.
arXiv:2606. 01746v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern neural networks are highly susceptible to adversarial perturbations.
The paper introduces concept-based property attacks, which target logical inconsistencies in human‑interpretable concepts (e.g., “red ∧ octagonal → stop_sign”) rather than merely flipping final class labels. It formalizes these properties, proves that attacking them reduces the search space compared to class‑level attacks, and implements them using concept‑based explainable AI techniques. Empirical results across vision and code‑processing models show that retraining with these attacks preserves robustness gains while better eliminating semantic biases.
arXiv:2310.16295v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Neural network have achieved remarkable successes in many scientific fields. However, the interpretability of the neural network model is sti...
The paper argues that prediction‑based certifications—such as accuracy, calibration, and conformal coverage—are insufficient to guarantee trustworthy AI. It proves a separation theorem showing that a model can appear reliable under all prediction‑side certificates yet differ arbitrarily in explanation fidelity and deployment behaviour. The authors propose a competence envelope framework that combines both prediction and explanation certification to detect such hidden failures.
Deep neural networks are often overconfident, assigning high confidence even to incorrect predictions. Consequently, users lack a reliable signal for deciding when a prediction can be trusted.