arXiv AI By Wenxin Tai, Yaqian Liu, Ting Zhong, Fan Zhou

Why Self-Inconsistency Arises in GNN Explanations and How to Exploit It

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2605. 07527v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent work has observed that explanations produced by Self-Interpretable Graph Neural Networks (SI-GNNs) can be self-inconsistent: when the model is reapplied to its own explanatory graph subset, it may produce a different explanation.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Jun 3

Learning Self-Interpretation from Interpretability Artifacts: Training Lightweight Adapters on Vector-Label Pairs

arXiv:2602. 10352v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Self-interpretation methods prompt language models to describe their own internal states, but remain unreliable due to hyperparameter sensitivity.

By Keenan Pepper, Alex McKenzie, Florin Pop, Stijn Servaes, Martin Leitgab, Mike Vaiana, Judd Rosenblatt, Michael S. A. Graziano, Diogo de Lucena
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 7

A Comparative Study of Counterfactual Explainers for Graph Neural Networks Enabling Multiple Types of Graph Edit

The paper presents a comparative analysis of six state‑of‑the‑art counterfactual explainers for graph neural networks, focusing on methods that can both add and remove edges to alter model predictions. It evaluates these explainers across diverse real‑world and synthetic datasets, covering binary and multi‑class graph and node classification tasks, using a range of quantitative and qualitative metrics. The study highlights the trade‑offs between explanation size, coverage, and quality, aiming to pinpoint each method’s strengths and weaknesses to inform future research.

By Maria Myrto Villia, Filippos Gouidis, Theodore Patkos, Panos Trahanias