arXiv:2606. 03495v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Heterogeneous graph neural networks (HGNNs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in modeling complex relational data, however their interpretability in high-stakes applications remains a critical challenge.
By Zongrui Li, Yuhang Zhao, Ying Zhao, Yuanzhao Guo, Qiang Huang, Yuan Tian
arXiv:2607. 04600v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Graph eXplainable AI (G-XAI) is increasingly important for making Graph Neural Networks interpretable and accountable.
By Francesco Paolo Nerini, Mirko Zaffaroni, Paolo Baracco, Gabriele Ciravegna, Alan Perotti
The paper presents a comparative analysis of six state‑of‑the‑art counterfactual explainers for graph neural networks, focusing on methods that can both add and remove edges to alter model predictions. It evaluates these explainers across diverse real‑world and synthetic datasets, covering binary and multi‑class graph and node classification tasks, using a range of quantitative and qualitative metrics. The study highlights the trade‑offs between explanation size, coverage, and quality, aiming to pinpoint each method’s strengths and weaknesses to inform future research.
By Maria Myrto Villia, Filippos Gouidis, Theodore Patkos, Panos Trahanias
arXiv:2607. 21381v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Instance-level explanations aim to reveal the rationale behind a model's decisions for a specific graph.
By Jiancu Chen, Shuyin Xia, Guan Wang, Degang Chen, Fan Chen
Instance-level explanations aim to reveal the rationale behind a model's decisions for a specific graph. Previous methods explain graph neural networks (GNNs) by selecting important edges to induce subgraphs, where edge importance is assessed by perturbing each edge and observing changes in the model predictions.
Graph eXplainable AI (G-XAI) is increasingly important for making Graph Neural Networks interpretable and accountable. While a growing number of explainers are available, choosing the right method and assessing the trustworthiness of its outputs remains unclear.