Where Not to Learn: Prior-Aligned Training with Subset-based Attribution Constraints
Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
arXiv:2602. 07008v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reliable models should not only predict correctly, but also justify decisions with acceptable evidence.
arXiv:2607. 23804v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Context attribution methods for large language models (LLMs) identify which input context contributes to the model response.
arXiv:2606. 10877v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Occlusion-based attribution methods provide an intuitive way to estimate feature importance by perturbing input features and measuring the resulting change in model output.
arXiv:2604.05819v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Interpreting the decisions of complex computer vision models is crucial to establish trust and accountability, especially in safety-critical...
arXiv:2606. 23872v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As generative models increasingly produce samples that are indistinguishable from human-created content, it becomes difficult to determine whether a given data point was part of a model's natural training set or was generated by the model itself, especially when models memorize and reproduce training data.
arXiv:2607. 12052v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Synthetic image attribution aims at identifying the generator responsible for a given AI-generated image.