arXiv:2602.07008v5 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Reliable models should not only predict correctly, but also base their decisions on acceptable evidence. However, conventional supervised learning...
By Ruoyu Chen, Shangquan Sun, Xiaoqing Guo, Kangwei Liu, Sanyi Zhang, Zhangcheng Wang, Shiming Liu, Qunli Zhang, Wei Wang, Hua Zhang, Xiaochun Cao
arXiv:2604.05819v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Interpreting the decisions of complex computer vision models is crucial to establish trust and accountability, especially in safety-critical...
By David Schinagl, Christian Fruhwirth-Reisinger, Alexander Prutsch, Samuel Schulter, Horst Possegger
The paper proposes a two‑stage framework, SL+LHF, that first learns low‑dimensional representations from noisy labeled data and then refines model alignment using human comparison feedback via a probabilistic bisection approach. It introduces the label‑noise‑to‑comparison‑accuracy (LNCA) ratio to theoretically identify when this framework outperforms pure supervised learning, showing that trading labels for comparisons reduces sample complexity when labels are scarce. Experiments on a high‑dimensional crowdfunding prediction task and an Amazon Mechanical Turk study confirm that incorporating human or large language model evaluators improves accuracy under a fixed query budget.
By Junyu Cao, Mohsen Bayati
arXiv:2505. 03201v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Integrated Gradients (IG) is a widely used attribution method in explainable AI, particularly in computer vision applications where reliable feature attribution is essential.
By Kien Tran Duc Tuan, Tam Nguyen Trong, Son Nguyen Hoang, Khoat Than, Anh Nguyen Duc
arXiv:2606. 26387v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) extend large language models (LLMs) with visual perception, enabling joint reasoning over images and text.
By Xi Xiao, Chen Liu, Chih-Ting Liao, Yunbei Zhang, Qizhen Lan, Yuxiang Wei, Lin Zhao, Janet Wang, Jianyang Gu, Muchao Ye, Tianyang Wang, Hao Xu
arXiv:2606. 23872v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As generative models increasingly produce samples that are indistinguishable from human-created content, it becomes difficult to determine whether a given data point was part of a model's natural training set or was generated by the model itself, especially when models memorize and reproduce training data.
By Bihe Zhao, Michel Meintz, Juangui Xu, Franziska Boenisch, Adam Dziedzic