arXiv AI
When Goals Leak Across Relationships: How Cached Goal Representations Shape Cross-Client Decisions
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 14
When Personal Memory Has No Single Answer: Evaluating LLM Agents under Irreducible Conflict
LLM agents increasingly maintain personal memory across sessions, but it can conflict. Preferences depend on context, behavior evolves, and sources can conflict. When a query lacks context, time, or s...
arXiv AI
Aug 17
When Personal Memory Has No Single Answer: Evaluating LLM Agents under Irreducible Conflict
arXiv:2608. 13921v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents increasingly maintain personal memory across sessions, but it can conflict.
arXiv AI
Oct 15
Observe, Share, or Predict? Disentangling Partner Information in Embodied Multi-Agent Collaboration
arXiv:2610.16895v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLMs are used as high-level controllers for embodied agents, but it remains unclear whether they support collaborative reasoning, such as anticipating...
arXiv AI
Oct 15
Agents Don't Just Agree, They Remember: Benchmarking Persistent Sycophancy in Self-Improving Personal Agents
arXiv:2607.10526v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Self-improving personal agents write profiles, memories, and reusable skills that carry over from one chat to the next. Prior works ask whether a m...
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 25
The Collaboration Tax: How Much LLM Multi-Agent Systems Pay to Coordinate
arXiv:2608.22152v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent systems built from large language models are deployed widely, yet how much performance is lost when two LLMs must coordinate rather than ac...
arXiv AI
Oct 31
Goal-Aware Dynamic Multi-Agent Collaboration for Long-Horizon Tasks
The paper introduces Goal-Aware Dynamic Multi-Agent Collaboration (GAD), a framework that assigns distinct duties to separate agents with individualized contexts to tackle long-horizon tasks. It employs a growing execution graph to structure subtasks and their dependencies, ensuring each agent retains the original instruction, task goal, and acceptance conditions. GAD dynamically adapts collaboration and information sharing, using verification and recovery checks to monitor subtask results and overall task completion, providing feedback for repair when checks fail.