The paper investigates how large language model agents handle long‑horizon tasks and finds that verification is crucial for success but often occurs too late. It shows that sharing a common context dilutes duty‑relevant information and that simply separating duties among agents is insufficient, as agents can lose sight of the overall goal. To address these issues, the authors propose Goal‑Aware Dynamic Multi‑Agent Collaboration (GAD), which uses an execution graph to organize subtasks, keeps each agent’s context focused on its specific goal, and dynamically adjusts task dependencies and information sharing based on execution evidence, with verification and recovery checks providing feedback for repair.
arXiv:2610.08155v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems (MAS) have become a promising paradigm for complex information-seeking and reasoning tasks by en...
By Zihan Zhou, Xinzhe Hu, Hanxu Yang, Liangjian Wen, Zhao Kang
arXiv:2610.16117v2 Announce Type: new
Abstract: LLM-based multi-agent collaboration is increasingly used to solve complex tasks by dividing work among specialized agents and integrating complementary...
By Chen Huang, Yiyang Zhang, Yuhao Wu, Yang Deng, Wenxuan Zhang
arXiv:2603. 21489v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: AI agents have become increasingly capable at isolated software engineering (SWE) tasks such as resolving issues on Github.
By Jiayi Geng, Graham Neubig
arXiv:2607. 23678v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) enable autonomous agents for reasoning, planning, and tool use.
By Mingzhou Fan, Siyuan Xu, Mingxuan Yuan
The paper introduces DHCG, a framework that dynamically constructs hierarchical collaboration graphs for large language model–based multi‑agent systems. DHCG coordinates Planner, Worker, and Generator modules to adaptively determine the composition and scale of agents during execution, guided by feedback and action‑aware preference optimization. Experiments on code generation, mathematical reasoning, and domain‑specific tasks show DHCG surpasses static and dynamic baselines, improving performance by 2.77–8.02 points and achieving a 13.06‑point gain over single‑agent baselines.
By Jie Ren, Jiakang Yuan, Chenyu Huang, Hezeer Ma, Jiayuan Fan, Tao Chen
arXiv:2606. 13003v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Prevailing wisdom posits that Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) are superior to Single-Agent Systems (SAS), citing advantages like context protection, parallel processing and distributed decision-making.
By Prathyusha Jwalapuram, Hehai Lin, Chuyuan Li, Fangkai Jiao, Sudong Wang, Yifei Ming, Zixuan Ke, Chengwei Qin, Giuseppe Carenini, Shafiq Joty
EMMA is a framework that treats the configuration of a multi‑agent system—controller routing, specialist prompts, and procedural skills—as structured episodic memory. It explicitly assigns ownership and limits updates through a reflector and backbone‑independent guards, ensuring edits are scoped, incremental, and bounded. Experiments on KramaBench, AppWorld, and BBEH show EMMA outperforms four baselines, achieving up to 32.5% higher performance and reducing training executions by 17–38%.
By Ruijia Niu, Kaiwen Liu, Rose Yu, Kristina Klinkner
arXiv:2610.34668v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Goal reasoning (GR) is the process by which intelligent agents continually reason about the goals they are pursuing, which may lead to goal change, for...
By Paola Rizzo, Hector Munoz-Avila, David W. Aha
The paper introduces Automated Multi-Agent Organization Design (AMOD), a framework that treats the organization of agents as a design object and uses an execution-driven loop to iteratively refine responsibilities and coordination rules. AMOD assigns functional responsibilities to agent teams, evaluates outcomes and interaction traces, and revises the organization to address missing, duplicated, or ineffective roles. The approach also proposes testing responsibilities by removal or replacement to validate their necessity.
By Shao-Jun Xia, Yuner Zhang, Huixin Zhang, Di Wang, Yifan Jiang, Liangxi Liu
Goal reasoning (GR) is the process by which intelligent agents continually reason about the goals they are pursuing, which may lead to goal change, for instance when opportunities arise, or when event...
The paper introduces a steering agent that supervises large language model (LLM)-based agents and multi‑agent systems during execution to prevent goal drift. By observing the execution context, the steering agent decides when to intervene using either a low‑cost fast path or a high‑cost slow path, and both paths are jointly trained with reinforcement learning. Experiments on information‑seeking search tasks demonstrate that the steering agent improves performance and efficiency for both single‑agent and multi‑agent systems, generalizes to out‑of‑domain tasks, and allows controllable intervention frequency without retraining.
By Leyang Shen, Yaxin Gong, Yang Zhang, Chenxiao Fan, Jiakai Wang, Dong Wang, Yang Liu, Fuli Feng, Chun Kai Ling, Tat-Seng Chua