arXiv Machine Learning By Olaf Yunus Laitinen Imanov, Rana Irem Turhan, Isgandar Jafarli

When Does Cheap Physics Help? Gated Multi-Fidelity Physics-Informed Networks with Provable Sample Savings and Conformal Guarantees

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper investigates when inexpensive low‑fidelity (LF) physics models can reduce the number of costly high‑fidelity (HF) simulations needed for accurate solutions of parametric partial differential equations. It derives a sample‑complexity bound showing that learning the HF field via its discrepancy from the LF model can cut HF samples by a factor of κ^{2γ}, where κ is the complexity ratio and γ the effective‑dimension exponent, and confirms this scaling in a kernel setting. Guided by this theory, the authors introduce GaMF‑PINN, a gated multi‑fidelity physics‑informed neural network that selectively trusts the LF model and falls back to physics‑only learning when necessary, coupled with a conformal uncertainty procedure that guarantees coverage of the HF solution. The method is evaluated on the newly released MFPDE‑Bench, achieving HF‑PINN accuracy with up to eight times fewer HF solves, robustness to corrupted LF models, and reliable uncertainty estimates compared to Bayesian PINNs and deep ensembles.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2

Taming the Loss Landscape of PINNs with Noisy Feynman-Kac Supervision: Operator Preconditioning and Non-Asymptotic Error Bounds

arXiv:2606. 00643v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) often train slowly or fail to converge on challenging partial differential equations (PDEs), a behavior recently linked to severely ill-conditioned loss landscapes inherited from the underlying differential operator.

By Nathanael Tepakbong, Hanyu Hu, Chengyu Liu, Xiang Zhou
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

Physics-Informed Conformal Prediction: Embedding PDE Consistency into Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantification for Neural Operators

Physics-Informed Conformal Prediction (PI‑CP) embeds PDE residuals into the nonconformity score of split conformal prediction, yielding distribution‑free prediction intervals with provable coverage that adapt spatially to physics violations. The method demonstrates consistent 89‑91% coverage across six physics scenarios, outperforming MC Dropout and Deep Ensembles, while Fourier Neural Operators (FNO) achieve superior accuracy over CNN and DeepONet. Additionally, the authors prove that FNO’s translation equivariance limits its ability to solve PDEs with Dirichlet boundary conditions, and show that adding coordinate channels can reduce error by up to 63×.

By Michael Chin
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22

Learning Physics from an Imperfect Ancestor

arXiv:2609.24947v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neural operators evaluate parametric partial differential equations cheaply but degrade sharply outside their training distribution. Physics-informed n...

By S. Mohammad Mousavi, Teeratorn Kadeethum, Nikolaos Bouklas, Somdatta Goswami