arXiv Machine Learning By Kwame Mbobda-Kuate, Gabriel Kasmi

When Bigger is Worse: A Practitioner's Guide to Model Selection Under Data Scarcity

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2603. 02142v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Scaling laws assume larger models trained on more data consistently outperform smaller ones -- an assumption that drives model selection in computer vision but remains untested in resource-constrained Earth observation (EO).

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 7

TESSERA v2: Scaling Pixel-wise Earth Foundation Models

arXiv:2607. 03949v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Pixel-wise Earth-observation (EO) foundation models are now achieving state-of-the-art performance via generated spatial embeddings.

By Zhengpeng Feng, Sadiq Jaffer, Ira Shokar, Jovana Knezevic, Mark Elvers, Clement Atzberger, Robin Young, Aneesh Naik, Niall Robinson, Andrew Blake, David Coomes, Anil Madhavapeddy, Srinivasan Keshav
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 28

SIMPLER: Efficient Foundation Model Adaptation via Similarity-Guided Layer Pruning for Earth Observation

SIMPLER is a pre‑fine‑tuning method that reduces inference and deployment costs for Earth Observation foundation models by pruning redundant layers. It uses layer‑wise representation similarity on unlabeled task data to identify and remove up to 79% of parameters without requiring gradients, magnitude heuristics, or hyperparameter tuning. Experiments on Prithvi‑EO‑2, TerraMind, and ImageNet‑pretrained ViT‑MAE show that SIMPLER retains 94% of baseline performance while achieving 2.1× faster training and 2.6× faster inference.

By V\'ictor Barreiro, Johannes Jakubik, Francisco Arg\"uello, Dora B. Heras
arXiv AI
2d ago

Useful to Whom? Sample Value Is Defined Only Relative to the Learner

The paper investigates how the usefulness of training samples, as determined by coreset selection, depends on the learner rather than just the data. Experiments on ImageNet-100 and ImageNet-1k show that changing model width, input grid, stride, and architecture (e.g., ResNet vs. ViT) shifts the crossover point where different selection criteria (easy-first vs. geometric coverage) become optimal. These findings demonstrate that the relative value of a fixed subset of samples varies with the target learner’s capacity and structure, and that selection strategies must be tuned to the specific model they will train.

By Yangze Liu, Xiao-Long Yin, Zhongyi Han
arXiv Computer Vision
4d ago

RS-OPSD: Reliable Privileged On-Policy-Self-Distillation for Ultra-High-Resolution Remote Sensing VQA

The paper introduces RS-OPSD, a reliable privileged on-policy self-distillation framework designed for ultra‑high‑resolution remote sensing visual question answering. It leverages a new dataset, GeoEvidence‑6K, and a human‑feedback guided skill refinement process to provide explicit question‑relevant evidence. By incorporating context‑preserving visual privilege and correctness‑aligned distillation, RS‑OPSD achieves state‑of‑the‑art performance on several benchmarks without requiring additional visual search or tool calls at inference time.

By Chengjie Jiang, Yunqi Zhou, Jiafeng Yan, Sihang Zhao, Chun Yuan, Jing Li
arXiv Computer Vision
3d ago

Cryo-Bench: Benchmarking Foundation Models for Cryosphere Mapping

Cryo-Bench is a new benchmark that evaluates foundation models for cryosphere mapping, comprising six semantic‑segmentation datasets across five cryospheric components (supraglacial debris, glacial lakes, sea ice, calving fronts, and Antarctic ice‑shelf extent). The benchmark includes multispectral, RGB, and SAR observations from under‑represented regions and tests thirteen geo‑foundation models alongside U‑Net and Vision Transformer baselines. Results show that with frozen encoders U‑Net slightly outperforms TerraMind, but the difference is not statistically significant; fine‑tuning with learning‑rate optimization can dramatically improve performance for some models, while in few‑shot scenarios several foundation models retain over 90 % of their full‑label accuracy.

By Saurabh Kaushik, Lalit Maurya, Beth Tellman, Swalpa Kumar Roy, Valerio Marsocci, Gustau Camps-Valls, Jocelyn Chanussot