arXiv AI
VAA-CSEC: Vote-guided Advantage Allocation for Chinese Semantic Error Correction
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
Hugging Face Trending Papers
3d ago
VAA-CSEC: Vote-guided Advantage Allocation for Chinese Semantic Error Correction
Chinese Semantic Error Correction (CSEC) targets semantic errors in Chinese text, which are typically more subtle and complex than spelling and grammatical errors but remain relatively underexplored....
arXiv AI
Jun 2
CSRP: Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Chinese Text Correction via Reinforcement Learning with Efficiency-Aware Rewards
arXiv:2606. 00020v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) based Chinese Grammatical Error Correction (CGEC) systems face two critical challenges: general-purpose models lack specialized linguistic priors for subtle grammatical distinctions, and Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) with Maximum Likelihood Estimation fails to optimize for precision-focused metrics, leading to systematic over-correction.
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28
TTPO: Test-Time Policy Optimization
The paper introduces Test‑Time Policy Optimization (TTPO), an approach that enables large language models to improve mathematical reasoning without relying on ground‑truth labels. TTPO uses majority‑vote pseudo‑labels and an asymmetric objective: it distills rollouts that agree with the pseudo‑label via On‑Policy Self‑Distillation and penalizes disagreeing rollouts with Grouped Reinforcement Learning. Token‑level selection further refines the process, down‑weighting already‑converged positions during distillation and penalizing only confident errors during RL. Experiments show that TTPO matches label‑supervised OPSD on five competition‑level benchmarks, boosts Qwen3‑1.7B from 38.0 % to 45.2 % in test‑time training, and achieves significant gains without explicit reasoning steps, while also generalizing well across tasks.
arXiv AI
Aug 13
Reinforcing Step-level Reasoning for Effective Self-Correction in LLMs
arXiv:2608. 11573v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Achieving effective self-correction, where models verify and correct their own mistakes, remains a fundamental challenge for large language models (LLMs).
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 12
Reinforcing Step-level Reasoning for Effective Self-Correction in LLMs
Achieving effective self-correction, where models verify and correct their own mistakes, remains a fundamental challenge for large language models (LLMs). In this work, we propose Self-Fix Step-DPO (SFS-DPO), a reinforcement learning based, two-stage framework for step-level self-verification and self-correction.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 4
Policy Improvement Reinforcement Learning
arXiv:2604. 00860v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has become a central post-training paradigm for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models.