Hugging Face Trending Papers August 12, 2026

Reinforcing Step-level Reasoning for Effective Self-Correction in LLMs

Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →

Achieving effective self-correction, where models verify and correct their own mistakes, remains a fundamental challenge for large language models (LLMs). In this work, we propose Self-Fix Step-DPO (SFS-DPO), a reinforcement learning based, two-stage framework for step-level self-verification and self-correction.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at Hugging Face Trending Papers.

arXiv AI

6d ago

Reinforcing Step-level Reasoning for Effective Self-Correction in LLMs

arXiv:2608. 11573v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Achieving effective self-correction, where models verify and correct their own mistakes, remains a fundamental challenge for large language models (LLMs).

By Vu Duc Anh, Nhat M. Hoang, Do Xuan Long, Cong-Duy Nguyen, Ponhvoan Srey, Luu Anh Tuan

llms reinforcement-learning

arXiv AI

Jun 2

Structure Enables Effective Self-Localization of Errors in LLMs

arXiv:2602. 02416v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Self-correction in language models remains elusive.

By Ankur Samanta, Akshayaa Magesh, Ayush Jain, Kavosh Asadi, Youliang Yu, Daniel Jiang, Boris Vidolov, Kaveh Hassani, Paul Sajda, Jalaj Bhandari, Yonathan Efroni

llms agents

arXiv Machine Learning

Jun 5

Learning Self-Correction in Vision-Language Models via Rollout Augmentation

arXiv:2602. 08503v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Self-correction is essential for solving complex reasoning problems in vision-language models (VLMs).

By Yi Ding, Ziliang Qiu, Bolian Li, Ruqi Zhang

llms reinforcement-learning multimodal benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jun 2

CSRP: Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Chinese Text Correction via Reinforcement Learning with Efficiency-Aware Rewards

arXiv:2606. 00020v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) based Chinese Grammatical Error Correction (CGEC) systems face two critical challenges: general-purpose models lack specialized linguistic priors for subtle grammatical distinctions, and Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) with Maximum Likelihood Estimation fails to optimize for precision-focused metrics, leading to systematic over-correction.

By Wei Tian, Yuhao Zhou, Man Lan

llms nlp reinforcement-learning fine-tuning benchmarks safety

arXiv Machine Learning

Aug 4

Self-Correction Bench: Uncovering and Addressing the Self-Correction Blind Spot in Large Language Models

arXiv:2507. 02778v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Although large language models (LLMs) have transformed AI, they still make errors and follow unproductive reasoning paths.

By Ken Tsui

llms fine-tuning safety

arXiv AI

1d ago

Delay, Plateau, or Collapse: Evaluating the Impact of Systematic Verification Error on RLVR

arXiv:2605. 02909v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has become a powerful approach for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs).

By Kazuki Egashira, Mark Vero, Jasper Dekoninck, Florian E. Dorner, Robin Staab, Martin Vechev

llms reinforcement-learning

Related stories

Reinforcing Step-level Reasoning for Effective Self-Correction in LLMs

Structure Enables Effective Self-Localization of Errors in LLMs

Learning Self-Correction in Vision-Language Models via Rollout Augmentation

CSRP: Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Chinese Text Correction via Reinforcement Learning with Efficiency-Aware Rewards

Self-Correction Bench: Uncovering and Addressing the Self-Correction Blind Spot in Large Language Models

Delay, Plateau, or Collapse: Evaluating the Impact of Systematic Verification Error on RLVR