arXiv:2608. 01400v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tabular foundation models, driven by in-context learning, have rapidly grown in quality and popularity.
By Rasa Hosseinzadeh, Alex Labach, Zexin Xue, Shuyi Han, Valentin Thomas, Anthony L. Caterini
arXiv:2606. 07345v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tabular foundation models, exemplified by TabPFN, perform prediction via in-context learning, inferring test labels directly from labeled training examples.
By Si-Yang Liu, Han-Jia Ye
SOMTab is a Set-Order Mamba architecture designed for efficient tabular in-context learning. It separates representation construction from query-conditioned retrieval, using Mamba-based state‑space mixing to build compact row and column representations while retaining attention for final prediction. The model, along with a synthetic prior called DCH‑TailMix, achieves performance comparable to Transformer‑based tabular foundation models but with faster inference and lower GPU memory usage.
By Hao Wang, Siyu Zhang, Wei Ma
The paper shows that Tabular Foundation Models (TFMs) are highly overparameterized, with up to 96% of transformer blocks removable without significant loss in performance. Using a closed‑form, label‑free affine translator, the authors demonstrate that halving the depth of eight leading TFMs costs at most $0.002$ median AUROC, while a single‑block TabPFN‑3 remains competitive. Removing depth saves up to 1.5 B parameters, speeds GPU inference up to 6×, and reduces memory usage by 6× with negligible accuracy loss.
By Irene Cannistraci, Julia E. Vogt
The paper introduces a reproducible benchmark for evaluating attention mechanisms in tabular foundation models, focusing on the distinct row and column attention patterns that differ from language model attention. It compares several backends—Torch SDPA, FlashAttention variants, vLLM, and SageAttention—across realistic tabular shapes on A100, H100, and B200 GPUs, revealing that optimal backend choice varies by attention type, hardware, and model specifics. The study finds FlashAttention generally performs best, but CuDNN can outperform it for column attention on longer sequences, while SageAttention excels for large row sequences beyond 16k rows.
By Maximilian Schambach, Clemens Biehl, Sam Thelin
The paper investigates how test‑time compute techniques—adaptation, aggregation, and context construction—can improve predictions of pretrained tabular foundation models (TFMs). It introduces DiagScale, a lightweight adaptation method that trains a minuscule fraction of parameters yet matches full fine‑tuning gains, and shows that selective aggregation of predictions from diverse preprocessing variants can reduce error, while broader context expansion offers inconsistent benefits. The study concludes that adaptation and selective aggregation consistently yield benchmark‑level improvements, but their combined use demands more computation, guiding strategy selection based on available resources.
By Kanghui Ning, Marin Bilo\v{s}, James T. Wilson, Yilang Zhang, Kashif Rasul, Dongjin Song, Anderson Schneider, Yuriy Nevmyvaka